Difference between revisions of "Geodata Packaging Working Group"

From OSGeo
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Existing and related projects)
m
Line 14: Line 14:
 
* [[User:bitner|David Bitner]]: Interested in creating packages of data formatted for use in MapServer or other OSGEO projects where optimization could come into play.
 
* [[User:bitner|David Bitner]]: Interested in creating packages of data formatted for use in MapServer or other OSGEO projects where optimization could come into play.
 
* [[User:Pnaciona|Perry Nacionales]]: What they said! :)
 
* [[User:Pnaciona|Perry Nacionales]]: What they said! :)
 +
* [[User:jmckenna|Jeff McKenna]]: Interested in setting guidelines for data distribution (formats etc)
 
* Please add your details!
 
* Please add your details!
  

Revision as of 08:16, 29 March 2006

This is a project of the Public Geospatial Data Committee

While OSGeo can provide guidance as to finding good sources of open and public geodata, it would be good to offer maintained packages of high-quality data and metadata for education and demonstration that can be used by the software projects.

Focus

  • Packaging / Quality Control / Metadata Augmentation / Documentation (focus on education, create educational/training data sets such as the GRASS Spearfish)

Participants

  • Markus Neteler: Interested in data processing and development of quality measures
  • Frank Warmerdam: Interested in processing data into more usable form, and providing foundation hosted or related download options, possibly also geotorrent.org.
  • Florian Kindl: Interested in defining metadata and qc guidelines, processing data and documentation.
  • David Bitner: Interested in creating packages of data formatted for use in MapServer or other OSGEO projects where optimization could come into play.
  • Perry Nacionales: What they said! :)
  • Jeff McKenna: Interested in setting guidelines for data distribution (formats etc)
  • Please add your details!

Tasks

  • Choose a data format for package distribution
  • Define data sets
    • (what should be the contents of a training dataset)
    • other Datasets: content
  • Set up metadata guidelines (digest OGC specs):
    • Specifications of a data set
      • Creator
      • Date
      • License
      • Data Type
      • Topic
      • Spatial Extent
      • Coordinate System/Projection
      • Target Scale/Precision
      • Attribute Data
  • Quality Control
    • Involve Community (feedback)
    • Offer means to easily correct data

Existing and related projects

Any possibility of replacing Spearfish, SD with an equally well-mapped place like Cambridge, MA? Or is the interest in updating Spearfish for the 21st Century? SchuylerErle

See Also