Difference between revisions of "Rfp-Possible-Improvements"

From OSGeo
Jump to: navigation, search
(Add my personal comment on the idea of delegating the booth to the LOC)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
* not mentioned that the LOC needs to have an entity (such as a professional conference organising company) in place for handling the bank part of the conference organising (Portland)
 
* not mentioned that the LOC needs to have an entity (such as a professional conference organising company) in place for handling the bank part of the conference organising (Portland)
 
* OSGeo should provide guidance on whether "key people" from projects should have free passes to the event, how many, and how they should be allocated
 
* OSGeo should provide guidance on whether "key people" from projects should have free passes to the event, how many, and how they should be allocated
* OSGeo should be responsible for providing marketing materials and staff for their exhibition booth (this can be delegated to the LOC where possible but the prime responsibility should be OSGeo)
+
* OSGeo should be responsible for providing marketing materials and staff for their exhibition booth (this can be delegated to the LOC where possible but the prime responsibility should be OSGeo) [''<--My comment on this is that it can't be delegated to the LOC since they are busy with a conference.  Perhaps it can be delegated to adjacent Local OSGeo Chapters?'']

Revision as of 14:29, 14 November 2013

Improvements to the RFP process:

  • not mentioned that OSGeo expects a complimentary booth in the exhibition space (Nottingham)
  • not mentioned that the LOC needs to have an entity (such as a professional conference organising company) in place for handling the bank part of the conference organising (Portland)
  • OSGeo should provide guidance on whether "key people" from projects should have free passes to the event, how many, and how they should be allocated
  • OSGeo should be responsible for providing marketing materials and staff for their exhibition booth (this can be delegated to the LOC where possible but the prime responsibility should be OSGeo) [<--My comment on this is that it can't be delegated to the LOC since they are busy with a conference. Perhaps it can be delegated to adjacent Local OSGeo Chapters?]