Difference between revisions of "Talk:Local Chapter Guidelines"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
==== Level three ====
 
==== Level three ====
Coudl be 'National Chapter'? The following are just suggestions and are not required.
+
Could be 'Regional Chapter'? The following are just suggestions and are not required.
 
* Official Organization in the country where it is formed
 
* Official Organization in the country where it is formed
 
* no OSGeo oversight of finances
 
* no OSGeo oversight of finances
Line 34: Line 34:
 
* own funding
 
* own funding
 
* local conferences
 
* local conferences
 
  
 
Groups working on building some momentum to form a chapter might start in level 1,  
 
Groups working on building some momentum to form a chapter might start in level 1,  
Line 42: Line 41:
 
Some local chapters that are essentially very local "social and support" groups.   
 
Some local chapters that are essentially very local "social and support" groups.   
 
For instance the OSGeo [[Ottawa Chapter]] would be focused around a local group that meets regularly
 
For instance the OSGeo [[Ottawa Chapter]] would be focused around a local group that meets regularly
as opposed to a "language or national" based group that might not meet in person frequently.
+
as opposed to a "language"-based or "regional" group that might not meet in person frequently.
  
 
OSGeo needs to ensure that local chapters are behaving in a manner congruent  
 
OSGeo needs to ensure that local chapters are behaving in a manner congruent  
Line 51: Line 50:
 
FrankW likes the idea of language based chapters acting as an advocate for
 
FrankW likes the idea of language based chapters acting as an advocate for
 
translation into their language.
 
translation into their language.
 +
 +
According to other docs and definitions, we would first call the Ottawa Chapter "the OSGeo Ottawa Regional Interest Group"?

Latest revision as of 15:30, 20 June 2006

Review

As posted by FrankW to International-Discuss and the board list. Please send all major edits on this page also to mailto:international-discuss@osgeo.org.

Concerns and Suggestions

  • Local chapter does not need to have a voting member of OSGeo involved

Suggestion to have 2-3 "levels" of chapter.

Level one

Category Interest Groups

  • does not need to have any "official" existance
  • does not formally represent OSGeo organisation
  • mailing list
  • wiki pages

Level two

Category Project

  • Official existance
  • Formally represents a foundation project
  • reports to the board
  • no OSGeo funding or management (I don't understand this point. how is it different from 'normal' OSGeo projects?)
  • mailing list
  • wiki pages
  • web pages
  • Documents directory
  • SVN(etc.?)

Level three

Could be 'Regional Chapter'? The following are just suggestions and are not required.

  • Official Organization in the country where it is formed
  • no OSGeo oversight of finances
  • own chapter board
  • own bank account
  • own funding
  • local conferences

Groups working on building some momentum to form a chapter might start in level 1, and might never get past that level if there is no need.

General Guidelines

Some local chapters that are essentially very local "social and support" groups. For instance the OSGeo Ottawa Chapter would be focused around a local group that meets regularly as opposed to a "language"-based or "regional" group that might not meet in person frequently.

OSGeo needs to ensure that local chapters are behaving in a manner congruent with the OSGeo mission, and not otherwise bringing the foundation into disrepute

Beyond that OSGeo shouldn't need to interfere much.

FrankW likes the idea of language based chapters acting as an advocate for translation into their language.

According to other docs and definitions, we would first call the Ottawa Chapter "the OSGeo Ottawa Regional Interest Group"?