SAC Meeting 2018-01-04

New Website status report

 * 1) Sent email to 26 wordpress accounts have no OSGeo LDAP (shared spreadsheet they can fill).
 * 2) Jody's answer: I got your email, with list of people that do not have a matching osgeo id. I do not have any direction, to provide - what answer are you looking for?
 * 3) Also told Jody he can start allowing people to edit. robe reports THIS IS DONE.  I sent email to all the folks that had no mapping and mapped LDAP accounts for those folks who provided me their LDAP.  Awaiting response from another 15 or so.  Those folks are still able to use thier wordpress accounts sans LDAP.


 * 1) Should we change default permissions for new users authenticated by LDAP.  Right now they can't do much aside from edit their profile.
 * 2) About LDAP: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2044
 * 3) Vicky: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2065
 * 4) Open tickets
 * 5) https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/query?status=!closed&component=WebSite
 * 6) https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues/175

Sys Admin Contract

 * 1) Signing status report
 * 2) Alex: Martin's company signed and returned (Dec 27), forwarded to VP and Treasurer for OSGeo to sign (Jan 2).

Drone upgrade status (pending from last meeting)

 * 1) Sandro & Regina: 

Migration off old hard-ware

 * 1) Alex:  Alex to propose hardware options to SAC mailing list based on https://www.siliconmechanics.com/

Virtualization, Containerization, or None
We need to decide about Virtualization and Containerization plans.


 * OSGeo6 was made without either in part because updating 4 OS was a lot of work.
 * Hardware is somewhat dependent on the solution. Ganeti or Openstack expect lots of cheap machines (3+) to work well. Redundancy is across machines instead of within machine.
 * It should be noted in all virtualization cases we plan to use KVM with LVM based images - Ganeti/Openstack/Libvirt are a management layer on top.


 * 1) | Hardware Option 1-3 $3000-$7500, | Hardware Option 4 $6300
 * 2) It's hard to find a dual cpu or high core count in a smaller case. So the more expensive systems could be less if we opt to not fill the drive slots. However we do need space for the foss4g archive and the downloads. So maybe a mix of SSD and Spinning...
 * 3) Option 4 based on a mix of SSD and Spinning disks for large and fast storage. Downloads can be handled by spinning SATA.
 * 4) Hosting Option: OSUOSL - VM of our choosing just like other cloud services.
 * 5) Hosting Option: Other


 * 1) Others
 * 2) 

GeoForAll DNS

 * 1) Jeff & Vicky:
 * 2) 

Go over status of SSL - FOSS4G2018 has asked

 * 1) Jeff & Vicky:
 * 2) Sent an e-mail inviting to this meeting
 * 3) https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2068
 * 4) https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2008
 * 5) https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2007

GitLab Status report

 * 1)  

Motions from last meeting
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/2017-December/009088.html

Budget

 * 1) Board Approved $20,000
 * 2) If we start running low we can request more during the year.
 * 3) Marketing also received $5000 for website/logo related work.

Other tasks from last meeting

 * 1) TODO for Alex: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2062

Attendance

 * jgarnett
 * MartinSpott
 * wildintellect
 * robe2
 * cvvergara
 * Mark____ Mark Iliffe
 * ragnvald Ragnvald Larsen hosting the 2018.foss4g.org website
 * strk

FUll transcript
TBD

Details
TBD

Next Meeting
Proposed Time: UTC: Thursday, January 18th, 2018 at 8:00 pm