Cat-Interop - Revision history

Tomkralidis at 02:00, 6 March 2014

2014-03-06T02:00:42Z

Tomkralidis at 15:27, 28 February 2014

2014-02-28T15:27:24Z

Tomkralidis at 18:03, 20 February 2014

2014-02-20T18:03:07Z

Tomkralidis at 17:53, 20 February 2014

2014-02-20T17:53:16Z

Tomkralidis: /* History */

2013-10-31T11:32:04Z

History

Wiki-Genuchten at 09:21, 31 October 2013

2013-10-31T09:21:43Z

Wiki-Genuchten: Created page with "''Workinggroup on Catalogue Interoperability'' * Home Page: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/cat-interop * Mailing List: http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cat-interop ..."

2013-10-31T09:20:07Z

Created page with "''Workinggroup on Catalogue Interoperability'' * Home Page: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/cat-interop * Mailing List: http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cat-interop ..."

New page

''Workinggroup on Catalogue Interoperability''

* Home Page: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/cat-interop
* Mailing List: http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cat-interop

== Description ==
The group aims to discuss (and test/implement) beter interoperability between the open source metadata servers and
clients. Mostly targetting the use case, find a dataset -> view a
dataset. But any other issue in catalogue interoperability can be suggested.

There is still quite some mis-matching in the
products out there due to different implementations. Clients as Geonode,
Qgis are not able to display an "add to map" button from some catalogue servers.
But even if the button is presented, still some
optimisations could be agreed upon. One of the goals would be to have a
seamless user experience (find->display) and prevent for example the
situation where in the CSW client a user should specify the type of
metadata catalogue (s)he wants to add data from.

== Approach ==
* End of 2013 we hope to agree on a specification to implement an interoperable DC-profile, work in progress is here [https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/Geonode-notes#metadata-links]
* Start of 2014 we hope projects will be able to set up forks with this implementation and we want to set up a test procedure (set of test records on osgeo-live-dvd)
* At FOSS4G 2014 we might organise a benchmark on interoperability

== History ==
First initiatives are here [[DCLite4G]].

The mailinglist was formed at FOSS4G 2013 in Nottingham as a result of a Birds of Feather on Catalogue interoperability. The BOF was visited by perticipants from [[Geonetwork]], [[pyCSW]], CKAN, [[Geonode]], [[Qgis]], [[OpenLayers]], [[GeoExt]].

[[Category:OSGeo Workinggroup]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 6 March 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	* Home Page: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/cat-interop		* Home Page: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/cat-interop
		+	* GitHub: https://github.com/OSGeo/Cat-Interop
	* Mailing List: http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cat-interop		* Mailing List: http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cat-interop

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 28 February 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	''Working Group ~~on Catalogue Interoperability~~''	+	''Catalogue Interoperability Working Group''

	* Home Page: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/cat-interop		* Home Page: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/cat-interop

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 20 February 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	''~~Workinggroup~~ on Catalogue Interoperability''	+	''Working Group on Catalogue Interoperability''

	* Home Page: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/cat-interop		* Home Page: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/cat-interop

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 First initiatives are here [[DCLite4G]].
-The mailinglist was formed at FOSS4G 2013 in Nottingham as a result of a Birds of Feather on Catalogue interoperability. The BOF was visited by participants from [[Geonetwork]], [[pyCSW]], CKAN, [[Geonode]], [[Qgis]], [[OpenLayers]], [[GeoExt]].
+The mailinglist was formed at FOSS4G 2013 in Nottingham as a result of a Birds of Feather on Catalogue interoperability. The BOF was visited by participants from [http://geonetwork-opensource.org GeoNetwork OpenSource], [http://pycsw.org pycsw], [http://ckan.org CKAN], [http://geonode.org GeoNode], [http://qgis.org QGIS], [[OpenLayers]], [http://geoext.org GeoExt].
 [[Category:OSGeo Workinggroup]]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 == Description ==
-The group aims to discuss (and test/implement) beter interoperability between the open source metadata servers and
+The group aims to discuss (and test/implement) better interoperability between open source metadata servers and
-clients. Mostly targetting the use case, find a dataset -> view a
+clients. Mostly targeting the use case, find a dataset -> view a dataset. But any other issue in catalogue interoperability can be suggested.
 Join the discussion at the mailinglist!
 There is still quite some mis-matching in the
-products out there due to different implementations. Clients as Geonode,
+products out there due to different implementations. Clients such as Geonode,
 Qgis are not able to display an "add to map" button from some catalogue servers.
 But even if the button is presented, still some
-optimisations could be agreed upon. One of the goals would be to have a
+optimizations could be agreed upon. One of the goals would be to have a
 seamless user experience (find->display) and prevent for example the
 situation where in the CSW client a user should specify the type of