Talk:Geodata Discovery Working Group - Revision history

Wiki-Sfkeller: /* Map Libraries */

2006-09-22T06:46:50Z

Map Libraries

Wiki-DK Flatla: Map Libraries

2006-09-22T02:35:09Z

Map Libraries

Wiki-Sfkeller: /* BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models */

2006-09-12T08:43:59Z

BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models

Wiki-Sfkeller: /* BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models */

2006-09-12T08:43:46Z

BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models

Wiki-Sfkeller: /* Proposal */

2006-09-12T05:43:34Z

Proposal

Wiki-Sfkeller: /* BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models */

2006-09-12T04:51:00Z

BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models

Wiki-Sfkeller: /* BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models */

2006-09-12T04:49:55Z

BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models

Wiki-Sfkeller: /* BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models */

2006-09-12T04:49:16Z

BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models

Wiki-Sfkeller at 04:41, 12 September 2006

2006-09-12T04:41:40Z

Wiki-Sfkeller: /* BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models */

2006-09-11T15:33:47Z

BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 22 September 2006
Line 48:		Line 48:

	Why doesn't someone look into the holdings and records of [[map library\|map libraries]]? [[User:DK Flatla\|DK Flatla]] 04:35, 22 September 2006 (CEST)		Why doesn't someone look into the holdings and records of [[map library\|map libraries]]? [[User:DK Flatla\|DK Flatla]] 04:35, 22 September 2006 (CEST)
		+
		+	:I'm not sure whether you mean classic paper map libraries? If yes, that's exactly where Dublin Core and [[OAI-PMH]] come from! -- [[User:Sfkeller\|SFK]] 08:46, 22 September 2006 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 22 September 2006
Line 44:		Line 44:
	* [[Simple_Catalog_Interface]]		* [[Simple_Catalog_Interface]]
	* ...		* ...
		+
		+	== Map Libraries ==
		+
		+	Why doesn't someone look into the holdings and records of [[map library\|map libraries]]? [[User:DK Flatla\|DK Flatla]] 04:35, 22 September 2006 (CEST)

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 ** Timelines
 ** Way forward
 Useful links for preparation:
 * [[Simple_Catalog_Interface]]
 * ...

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 '''Agenda'''
-* Overview, short(!) statements of all about catalog services implementation:
+* Overview, short(!) mission statements about catalog services implementation (all):
 ** ''What are the experiences so far?''
 ** ''What are the requirements?''
@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 ** Timelines
 ** Way forward

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:43, 12 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~== Proposal ==~~	+	I wrote a proposal for an effort to specify (= profile) a geospatial search protocol. Background: Currently, implementations of geospatial catalogue (search) services, like CSW, are rare. Some say ([http://www.digitalearth.com.au/2006/06/23/lightweight-web-resource-catalogue/][http://geotips.blogspot.com/2006/02/more-simple-web-services-catalogues.html]) that they are too complicated while the problem supposedly lies deeper: it's probably the metadata model which is also too sized. On the other hand there seems to be a trend towards search protocols (Web 2.0). So perhaps time is ripe for another effort. Proposal: See [[Simple_Catalog_Interface]] [[User:Sfkeller\|SFK]] 19:58, 13 July 2006 (CEST)
−
−	~~This is~~ a proposal for an effort to specify (= profile) a geospatial search protocol. Background: Currently, implementations of geospatial catalogue (search) services, like CSW, are rare. Some say ([http://www.digitalearth.com.au/2006/06/23/lightweight-web-resource-catalogue/][http://geotips.blogspot.com/2006/02/more-simple-web-services-catalogues.html]) that they are too complicated while the problem supposedly lies deeper: it's probably the metadata model which is also too sized. On the other hand there seems to be a trend towards search protocols (Web 2.0). So perhaps time is ripe for another effort. Proposal: See [[Simple_Catalog_Interface]] [[User:Sfkeller\|SFK]] 19:58, 13 July 2006 (CEST)

	== BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models ==		== BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models ==

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 == BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models ==
 This is an open BOF; participants are welcome!
 * Chairs: Stefan F. Keller (organization) and Tom Kralidis
-* Participants: curr. about 8
+* Participants: curr. expected about 8
 * Duration: One hour
 * Time: '''Thursday, 14 Sept., 12:30-13:30''' (not Tuesday, 12 Sept., 17:30-18:30)
 * Room: Amphimax (MAX 351).
-* Infrastructure:
+* Infrastructure: Beamer, (Sandwich ok)

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 '''Agenda'''
-* Overview, short(!) statements of all about catalog services implementation
+* Overview, short(!) statements of all about catalog services implementation:
-** What are the experiences so far?
+** ''What are the experiences so far?''
-** What are the requirements
+** ''What are the requirements?''
-** What are possible alternatives, how should we/NSDIs proceed?
+** ''What are possible alternatives, how should we/NSDIs proceed?''
 * Approaches:

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 '''Agenda'''
-* Overview / Approaches:
+* Overview, short(!) statements of all about catalog services implementation
 ** owscat (Tom Kralidis)
 ** OAI approach (Stefan F. Keller)
@@ Line 29: / Line 34: @@
 ** Client programming (Jody Garnett)
-* Software:
+* CSW Software:
 ** GeoNetwork (Jeroen Ticheler?)
 ** deegree (someone?)
@@ Line 37: / Line 42: @@
 ** FGDC extended (Jo Walsh?) => Metadata Management
 ** Dublin Core extended (Stefan) => Metadata Exchange
 * Discussion of pros and cons of approaches (all)
 ** Timelines
 ** Way forward

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 * Infrastructure:
 ** Beamer
-** (Sandwich for ok)
+** (Sandwich ok)
 '''Agenda'''
@@ Line 31: / Line 32: @@
 ** GeoNetwork (Jeroen Ticheler?)
 ** deegree (someone?)
 * Models for Metadata Management and for Exchange
 ** CSW 2.1 ebRIM (Raj Singh?) => Metadata Management