Difference between revisions of "Executive Director"
Wiki-JoWalsh (talk | contribs) m |
m (→Powers) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== Powers == | == Powers == | ||
| − | + | I think they need to have some degree of spending authority. They | |
| − | + | should be able to take actions within current guidelines (for instane | |
| − | + | accept sponsorships according to a sponsorship policy once we have | |
| − | + | a policy). | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | The shouldn't be able to accept projects into incubation, or graduate | ||
| + | them. They shouldn't be able to make major spending decisions on their | ||
| + | own. They shouldn't be able to declare people charter members. | ||
| + | Basically, I think they need quite a bit of leeway to get things done, | ||
| + | but they can't countermand or usurp the board or committees. | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
Revision as of 11:49, 10 August 2006
Background
The Board has been discussing the idea of hiring one full-time staff member for OSGeo. This page is an attempt to describe the responsibilities of an Executive Director for the Foundation.
Responsibilities
- Acting as a "mentor" for Committees in times of need.
- Acting as an "ambassador" for OSGeo at community and industry events
- Organising presence + materials for events
- Being an active member of the Website Committee and help work on the website
- With VisCom, some oversight of web and documentation materials
- With FunCom, some responsibility for managing fundraising process, grantwriting
- Acting as primary contact person for the outside, getting requests to appropriate places
- Help plan and implement running infrastructure needs
Please add what you think should be in-remit to this list! The point here is to come up with a clear job description eventually; but it would be helpful to overspecify rather than underspecify this.
Powers
I think they need to have some degree of spending authority. They should be able to take actions within current guidelines (for instane accept sponsorships according to a sponsorship policy once we have a policy).
The shouldn't be able to accept projects into incubation, or graduate them. They shouldn't be able to make major spending decisions on their own. They shouldn't be able to declare people charter members.
Basically, I think they need quite a bit of leeway to get things done, but they can't countermand or usurp the board or committees.
Notes
So what Executive Director would need to be is a mentor helping out when there is trouble between the bros and sisters of the Foundation.
This would be one role, but not a substantial part of the activity of the ED in my mind. I see them more often in an outwards facing role, as the ambassador of OSGeo. But also providing mundane support to the various committees to ensure that things are getting done that need to be. Drafting policies, web materials, etc.
Questions
- Would there be any overlap with the Collabnet staff position responsibilities?