Difference between revisions of "Geodata Committee Meeting 20060406"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 42: Line 42:
  
 
* Concern over metadata standards like [http://biology.usgs.gov/fgdc.metadata/version2/ FGDC] that may be irrelevant or raise too high a barrier to contribution by users.
 
* Concern over metadata standards like [http://biology.usgs.gov/fgdc.metadata/version2/ FGDC] that may be irrelevant or raise too high a barrier to contribution by users.
 +
** Recommended we look at [http://edcnts11.cr.usgs.gov/metalite/ MetaLite], a Windows program for creating basic FGDC metadata.
 +
** http://edcnts11.cr.usgs.gov/metalite/help/fgdc.html lists "the smallest  complete "core" of the FGDC standard that would still give sufficient basis for creating a clearinghouse"
 
* Discussion of the basic minimum of metadata attributes to make a data set useful
 
* Discussion of the basic minimum of metadata attributes to make a data set useful
 
** File format
 
** File format
Line 49: Line 51:
 
** License
 
** License
 
** Source URL
 
** Source URL
* Recommended we look at [http://edcnts11.cr.usgs.gov/metalite/ MetaLite], a Windows program for creating basic FGDC metadata.
 
** http://edcnts11.cr.usgs.gov/metalite/help/fgdc.html lists "the smallest  complete "core" of the FGDC standard that would still give sufficient basis for creating a clearinghouse"
 
 
* Action Items
 
* Action Items
 
** Jo agrees to work out what is already expressed in very common metadata namespaces like Dublin Core and FOAF versus what may need to be expressed in a custom or domain-specific (e.g. GML) namespace (such as representing projection, extent data etc that can be inferred from OGR).
 
** Jo agrees to work out what is already expressed in very common metadata namespaces like Dublin Core and FOAF versus what may need to be expressed in a custom or domain-specific (e.g. GML) namespace (such as representing projection, extent data etc that can be inferred from OGR).

Revision as of 09:00, 6 April 2006

Public Geospatial Data Committee Meeting 2006-Apr-06

Meeting Info

 Chair: Jo Walsh
 Minutes: Schuyler Erle
 IRC: #osgeo channel on irc.freenode.org
 Date: 2006-Apr-06 (at least in the Americas and Europe)
 Time: Wednesday, 16:00 UTC

Agenda Items

Old Business

New Business

Minutes

Attendance

Schuyler Erle, John Graham, Jeff McKenna, Jo Walsh, Frank Warmerdam

please add yourself ;-)

IRC Log

Data Hosting

  • The Public Geospatial Data Committee (e.g. 'we') plans to host data at http://osgeo.telascience.org/, courtesy of John Graham and the SDSC.
  • Agreed we should start by hosting +/- two showcase data sets, one raster, one vector.
  • Agreed we should host these datasets in their original formats first, before adding derivative/value-added versions.
  • Agreed we should host download via HTTP, download via BitTorrent, and OGC Web Service access.
  • Agreed we should peer datasets through GeoTorrent. Noted that they have data format requirements for hosted data sets that may not meet our needs -- e.g. VMap0. Frank Warmerdam will speak with Richard Orchard of GeoTorrent about this.
  • Schuyler volunteers to sketch out a plan for hosting two initial datasets, most likely VMap0 and Blue Marble NG (both of which John already has downloaded to the server).

Metadata Standards

  • Concern over metadata standards like FGDC that may be irrelevant or raise too high a barrier to contribution by users.
  • Discussion of the basic minimum of metadata attributes to make a data set useful
    • File format
    • Projection
    • Text description
    • Ownership/provenance
    • License
    • Source URL
  • Action Items
    • Jo agrees to work out what is already expressed in very common metadata namespaces like Dublin Core and FOAF versus what may need to be expressed in a custom or domain-specific (e.g. GML) namespace (such as representing projection, extent data etc that can be inferred from OGR).
    • John will talk to GEON participants about their work in agreeing on common metadata.

Next Meeting