Difference between revisions of "IncCom Meeting14"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Minutes: added minutes.)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
= Minutes =  
 
= Minutes =  
  
 +
Full Log: http://logs.qgis.org/osgeo/%23osgeo.2010-03-03.log
  
 +
Attending: Daniel Morissette, Judit Mays, Paul Spencer, Jorge Sanz, Markus Schneider, Cameron Shorter, Tyler Mitchell, Pieter De Graef, Dirk Frigne
 +
 +
* Minutes of [[IncCom_Meeting13|last meeting]] adopted.
 +
* Considered [[Project Retiring Process]] and recommended several improvements.  Cameron will call for a vote on the list once the changes are incorporated.
 +
* Considered [[Project Graduation Checklist]].  There was a failure to achieve consensus on stricter requirements for quality control and incorporation into multi-project binary distributions. 
 +
* Considered [http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/506 application for geomajas].  A motion was passed recommending to the board that geomajas be accepted into incubation with Paul Spencer as mentor, and Pieter De Graef as project representative.
 +
* Some general discussion including:
 +
** whether our pending and in-incubation lists are being properly maintained (Frank agreed to work on this)
 +
** whether we have too many overlapping projects
 +
** how to judge if a project is too small/immature
 +
** possible roles for OSGeo Labs
 +
** whether we ought to be rejecting or otherwise acting on some of the old applications.
 +
** a review of the PyWPS application
 +
* The meeting was closed.
  
 
[[Category:Incubation]]
 
[[Category:Incubation]]

Revision as of 14:23, 3 March 2010

Time

Proposed date: We/Th, 10/11 of March 2010.

Proposed time 19:30 UTC

Proposed location: IRC channel #osgeo (alternative Web client).

Agenda

Minutes

Full Log: http://logs.qgis.org/osgeo/%23osgeo.2010-03-03.log

Attending: Daniel Morissette, Judit Mays, Paul Spencer, Jorge Sanz, Markus Schneider, Cameron Shorter, Tyler Mitchell, Pieter De Graef, Dirk Frigne

  • Minutes of last meeting adopted.
  • Considered Project Retiring Process and recommended several improvements. Cameron will call for a vote on the list once the changes are incorporated.
  • Considered Project Graduation Checklist. There was a failure to achieve consensus on stricter requirements for quality control and incorporation into multi-project binary distributions.
  • Considered application for geomajas. A motion was passed recommending to the board that geomajas be accepted into incubation with Paul Spencer as mentor, and Pieter De Graef as project representative.
  • Some general discussion including:
    • whether our pending and in-incubation lists are being properly maintained (Frank agreed to work on this)
    • whether we have too many overlapping projects
    • how to judge if a project is too small/immature
    • possible roles for OSGeo Labs
    • whether we ought to be rejecting or otherwise acting on some of the old applications.
    • a review of the PyWPS application
  • The meeting was closed.