Difference between revisions of "OSGeo Bylaws"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Moved to official site.) |
Tomkralidis (talk | contribs) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Original document moved to official site: | |
| − | [https://www.osgeo.org/ | + | [https://www.osgeo.org/about/bylaws/ https://www.osgeo.org/about/bylaws/] |
| + | |||
| + | [https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/blob/master/board/documents/bylaws.odt working document] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The bylaws no longer cover everything the foundation is doing (process for board re-elections, local chapters, sponsorship relations, status of charter and regular members) and ideally they should. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Our bylaws are also default corporate boilerplate and [[User:JoWalsh]] Jo thinks it would be great to have a human-readable version that actually reflects what we are doing, we can be later translated into attorney-speak, rather than something legally perfect but not actually mapping to what we are doing. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Names of people interested in helping to update the bylaws == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[User:JoCook | Jo Cook]] | ||
| + | * Frank Warmerdam | ||
| + | |||
| + | == References: == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html - more corporate boilerplate, quite minimal. Not a model approach for us. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse%20BYLAWS%202003_11_10%20Final.pdf - Eclipse worked out a lot from others' experiences. This also covers a lot of the woolier membership issues. Verbose, but perhaps nesc. to be complere. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/documents/mf-bylaws.pdf Mozilla foundation bylaws - somewhere in between. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * http://www.okfn.org/governance/ - the Open Knowledge Foundation is also renewing its governance process and has a much lighter weight approach but still taking into account the necessities of legal responsibility of officers/directors etc | ||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 17 May 2019
Original document moved to official site:
https://www.osgeo.org/about/bylaws/
working document
The bylaws no longer cover everything the foundation is doing (process for board re-elections, local chapters, sponsorship relations, status of charter and regular members) and ideally they should.
Our bylaws are also default corporate boilerplate and User:JoWalsh Jo thinks it would be great to have a human-readable version that actually reflects what we are doing, we can be later translated into attorney-speak, rather than something legally perfect but not actually mapping to what we are doing.
Names of people interested in helping to update the bylaws
- Jo Cook
- Frank Warmerdam
References:
- http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html - more corporate boilerplate, quite minimal. Not a model approach for us.
- http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse%20BYLAWS%202003_11_10%20Final.pdf - Eclipse worked out a lot from others' experiences. This also covers a lot of the woolier membership issues. Verbose, but perhaps nesc. to be complere.
- http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/documents/mf-bylaws.pdf Mozilla foundation bylaws - somewhere in between.
- http://www.okfn.org/governance/ - the Open Knowledge Foundation is also renewing its governance process and has a much lighter weight approach but still taking into account the necessities of legal responsibility of officers/directors etc