Difference between revisions of "Paris Code Sprint 2016 : Feedback"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Aim is both to provide feedbacks to the sponsors, and to help prepare next editions...
 
Aim is both to provide feedbacks to the sponsors, and to help prepare next editions...
 
  
  
Line 13: Line 12:
  
 
Bruno Friedmann - https://lizards.opensuse.org/2016/02/27/tosprint-or-not-to-sprint
 
Bruno Friedmann - https://lizards.opensuse.org/2016/02/27/tosprint-or-not-to-sprint
 +
  
 
== Free Expression ==
 
== Free Expression ==
Express in few words, few lines, (or pictures), what this Code Sprint was for you and yours projects.
+
Express in few words, few lines, what this Code Sprint was for you and yours projects.
(link to blog or tweets are also fine...)
+
(link to tweets are also fine...)
 
 
Some pictures are [https://www.flickr.com/groups/osgeo/ here]
 
 
 
[[User:Lucadelu|Lucadelu]] ([[User talk:Lucadelu|talk]]) 06:57, 26 February 2016 (PST) - Really great organization and amazing coding place! Thanks to sponsor and organizer.
 
 
 
[[User:Tigerfoot|Tigerfoot]] ([[User talk:Tigerfoot|talk]]) 19:30, 27 February 2016 (PST) - Perfect organization and great place. My report [https://lizards.opensuse.org/2016/02/27/tosprint-or-not-to-sprint/ here]
 
  
 +
Luca Delucchi - Really great organization and amazing coding place! Thanks to sponsor and organizer.
  
 +
Bruno Friedmann - Perfect organization and great place.
  
 
Howard Butler: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000615.html
 
Howard Butler: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000615.html
Line 37: Line 33:
  
 
Stephan  Meißl: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000620.html
 
Stephan  Meißl: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000620.html
 +
 +
  
 
== What should be kept for a next edition ? ==
 
== What should be kept for a next edition ? ==
  
 
== What should be enhanced or at least not been done that way  ? ==
 
== What should be enhanced or at least not been done that way  ? ==

Revision as of 13:59, 2 March 2016

Feedbacks after the Paris Code Sprint 2016 edition.

Aim is both to provide feedbacks to the sponsors, and to help prepare next editions...


Blogs

Victor Poughon - https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/orfeo-toolbox-team-at-the-osgeo-paris-code-sprint-2016/

Giuseppe Broccolo - http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/brin-postgis-codesprint2016-paris/

Bruno Friedmann - https://lizards.opensuse.org/2016/02/27/tosprint-or-not-to-sprint


Free Expression

Express in few words, few lines, what this Code Sprint was for you and yours projects. (link to tweets are also fine...)

Luca Delucchi - Really great organization and amazing coding place! Thanks to sponsor and organizer.

Bruno Friedmann - Perfect organization and great place.

Howard Butler: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000615.html

Paul Ramsey: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000616.html

Daniel Morissette: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000617.html

Luca Delucchi: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000618.html

Angelos Tsotzos: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000619.html

Stephan Meißl: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000620.html


What should be kept for a next edition ?

What should be enhanced or at least not been done that way ?