Paris Code Sprint 2016 : Feedback

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Feedbacks after the Paris Code Sprint 2016 edition.

Aim is both to provide feedbacks to the sponsors, and to help prepare next editions...


Blog posts

Victor Poughon - https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/orfeo-toolbox-team-at-the-osgeo-paris-code-sprint-2016/

Giuseppe Broccolo - http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/brin-postgis-codesprint2016-paris/

Bruno Friedmann - https://lizards.opensuse.org/2016/02/27/tosprint-or-not-to-sprint

Even Rouault - http://erouault.blogspot.fr/2016/03/paris-osgeo-code-sprint-2016-debrief.html

Paul Ramsey - http://blog.cleverelephant.ca/2016/03/paris-code-sprint-postgis-recap.html

Howard Butler - http://howardbutler.com/pdal-paris-sprint-recap.html

Regina Obe (PostgresOnLine) - http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/archives/363-Paris-OSGeo-Code-Sprint-2016-Highlights.html

Regina Obe (BostonGIS) - http://www.bostongis.com/blog/index.php?/archives/252-Paris-OSGeo-Code-Sprint-2016-PostGIS-Highlights.html

Olivier Courtin - http://www.oslandia.com/osgeo-codesprint-2016-in-paris-en.html

Free Expression

Express in few words, few lines, what this Code Sprint was for you and yours projects. (link to tweets are also fine...)


Luca Delucchi - Really great organization and amazing coding place! Thanks to sponsor and organizer. http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000618.html

Bruno Friedmann - Perfect organization and great place.

Howard Butler: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000615.html

Paul Ramsey: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000616.html

Daniel Morissette: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000617.html

Angelos Tsotzos: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000619.html

Stephan Meißl: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000620.html

Mateusz Loskot: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2016-March/015737.html

What should be kept for a next edition ?

What should be enhanced or at least not been done that way ?