Difference between revisions of "Talk:Core Curriculum Project"
m (typo) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I wonder if "Core Curriculum" is what we really mean. I think of "Core Curriculum" as a set of resources to support a single topic, even if that topic is quite broad. For OSGeo I’m not sure what the “Core” is. I think we would want material to support a broad range of topics that would be difficult to bring under a single theme. Would something like the Education and Outreach Project make more sense? | I wonder if "Core Curriculum" is what we really mean. I think of "Core Curriculum" as a set of resources to support a single topic, even if that topic is quite broad. For OSGeo I’m not sure what the “Core” is. I think we would want material to support a broad range of topics that would be difficult to bring under a single theme. Would something like the Education and Outreach Project make more sense? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ned, I think that "Educational Outreach" might make sense. I am assuming the focus of this group would be on supporting teaching geospatial topics using open source software, right? Does this group want to address outreach to university based researchers too, or is that a different topic (I think so). --[[User:Warmerda|Warmerda]] 04:13, 20 February 2006 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 20:13, 19 February 2006
Originally posted by User:Nedhorning
I wonder if "Core Curriculum" is what we really mean. I think of "Core Curriculum" as a set of resources to support a single topic, even if that topic is quite broad. For OSGeo I’m not sure what the “Core” is. I think we would want material to support a broad range of topics that would be difficult to bring under a single theme. Would something like the Education and Outreach Project make more sense?
Ned, I think that "Educational Outreach" might make sense. I am assuming the focus of this group would be on supporting teaching geospatial topics using open source software, right? Does this group want to address outreach to university based researchers too, or is that a different topic (I think so). --Warmerda 04:13, 20 February 2006 (CET)