Difference between revisions of "Talk:Geodata Discovery Working Group"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | I wrote a proposal for an effort to specify (= profile) a geospatial search protocol. Background: Currently, implementations of geospatial catalogue (search) services, like CSW, are rare. Some say ([http://www.digitalearth.com.au/2006/06/23/lightweight-web-resource-catalogue/][http://geotips.blogspot.com/2006/02/more-simple-web-services-catalogues.html]) that they are too complicated while the problem supposedly lies deeper: it's probably the metadata model which is also too sized. On the other hand there seems to be a trend towards search protocols (Web 2.0). So perhaps time is ripe for another effort. Proposal: See [[Simple_Catalog_Interface]] [[User:Sfkeller|SFK]] 19:58, 13 July 2006 (CEST) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
== BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models == | == BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models == | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
This is an open BOF; participants are welcome! | This is an open BOF; participants are welcome! | ||
| + | Organization: See [[OSGeo_at_FOSS4G2006#BOFs]] | ||
* Chairs: Stefan F. Keller (organization) and Tom Kralidis | * Chairs: Stefan F. Keller (organization) and Tom Kralidis | ||
| − | * Participants: curr. about 8 | + | * Participants: curr. expected about 8 |
* Duration: One hour | * Duration: One hour | ||
* Time: '''Thursday, 14 Sept., 12:30-13:30''' (not Tuesday, 12 Sept., 17:30-18:30) | * Time: '''Thursday, 14 Sept., 12:30-13:30''' (not Tuesday, 12 Sept., 17:30-18:30) | ||
| − | * Room: Amphimax. | + | * Room: Amphimax (MAX 351). |
| + | * Infrastructure: Beamer, (Sandwich ok) | ||
'''Agenda''' | '''Agenda''' | ||
| − | * Overview / Approaches: | + | * Overview, short(!) mission statements about catalog services implementation (all): |
| + | ** ''What are the experiences so far?'' | ||
| + | ** ''What are the requirements?'' | ||
| + | ** ''What are possible alternatives, how should we/NSDIs proceed?'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Approaches: | ||
** owscat (Tom Kralidis) | ** owscat (Tom Kralidis) | ||
** OAI approach (Stefan F. Keller) | ** OAI approach (Stefan F. Keller) | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
** Client programming (Jody Garnett) | ** Client programming (Jody Garnett) | ||
| − | * Software: | + | * CSW Software: |
** GeoNetwork (Jeroen Ticheler?) | ** GeoNetwork (Jeroen Ticheler?) | ||
** deegree (someone?) | ** deegree (someone?) | ||
| + | |||
* Models for Metadata Management and for Exchange | * Models for Metadata Management and for Exchange | ||
** CSW 2.1 ebRIM (Raj Singh?) => Metadata Management | ** CSW 2.1 ebRIM (Raj Singh?) => Metadata Management | ||
** FGDC extended (Jo Walsh?) => Metadata Management | ** FGDC extended (Jo Walsh?) => Metadata Management | ||
** Dublin Core extended (Stefan) => Metadata Exchange | ** Dublin Core extended (Stefan) => Metadata Exchange | ||
| + | |||
* Discussion of pros and cons of approaches (all) | * Discussion of pros and cons of approaches (all) | ||
** Timelines | ** Timelines | ||
** Way forward | ** Way forward | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Useful links for preparation: | ||
| + | * [[Simple_Catalog_Interface]] | ||
| + | * ... | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Map Libraries == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why doesn't someone look into the holdings and records of [[map library|map libraries]]? [[User:DK Flatla|DK Flatla]] 04:35, 22 September 2006 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I'm not sure whether you mean classic paper map libraries? If yes, that's exactly where Dublin Core and [[OAI-PMH]] come from! -- [[User:Sfkeller|SFK]] 08:46, 22 September 2006 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:46, 21 September 2006
I wrote a proposal for an effort to specify (= profile) a geospatial search protocol. Background: Currently, implementations of geospatial catalogue (search) services, like CSW, are rare. Some say ([1][2]) that they are too complicated while the problem supposedly lies deeper: it's probably the metadata model which is also too sized. On the other hand there seems to be a trend towards search protocols (Web 2.0). So perhaps time is ripe for another effort. Proposal: See Simple_Catalog_Interface SFK 19:58, 13 July 2006 (CEST)
BOF on Geodata Discovery and Metadata Models
This is an open BOF; participants are welcome!
Organization: See OSGeo_at_FOSS4G2006#BOFs
- Chairs: Stefan F. Keller (organization) and Tom Kralidis
- Participants: curr. expected about 8
- Duration: One hour
- Time: Thursday, 14 Sept., 12:30-13:30 (not Tuesday, 12 Sept., 17:30-18:30)
- Room: Amphimax (MAX 351).
- Infrastructure: Beamer, (Sandwich ok)
Agenda
- Overview, short(!) mission statements about catalog services implementation (all):
- What are the experiences so far?
- What are the requirements?
- What are possible alternatives, how should we/NSDIs proceed?
- Approaches:
- owscat (Tom Kralidis)
- OAI approach (Stefan F. Keller)
- Google scraping (Paul Ramsey)
- Client programming (Jody Garnett)
- CSW Software:
- GeoNetwork (Jeroen Ticheler?)
- deegree (someone?)
- Models for Metadata Management and for Exchange
- CSW 2.1 ebRIM (Raj Singh?) => Metadata Management
- FGDC extended (Jo Walsh?) => Metadata Management
- Dublin Core extended (Stefan) => Metadata Exchange
- Discussion of pros and cons of approaches (all)
- Timelines
- Way forward
Useful links for preparation:
Map Libraries
Why doesn't someone look into the holdings and records of map libraries? DK Flatla 04:35, 22 September 2006 (CEST)