Difference between revisions of "WebComTODO"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(remove news queue ... work done.)
(Redirected page to Archived)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This page tracks both general direction and user-submitted tasks for WebCom
+
#REDIRECT [[Archived]]
  
=General Direction=
+
= General Direction =
 +
 
 +
== Transition Related ==
 +
 
 +
* Approve and post a Privacy Policy.  We used to have one similar to http://www.jxta.org/nonav/servlets/LegalNotices?type=PrivacyPolicy on the old site, and might want to emulate it.
 +
* Provide some mechanism for feedback for the website.  Perhaps a "feedback" link that suggests email to info@osgeo.org?
 +
* Do we need a "terms of use" document?  I'm not sure what happened to our old terms of use, but they were partly collabnet oriented.
  
 
== Current Work ==
 
== Current Work ==
Line 17: Line 23:
 
* Work on web site overall style. (waiting for decision on tech infrastructure)
 
* Work on web site overall style. (waiting for decision on tech infrastructure)
 
* Organize translation volunteers. (need technical infrastructure for multilang support)
 
* Organize translation volunteers. (need technical infrastructure for multilang support)
* We need some mechanism(s) to ensure the folks realize material in the wiki is not authoritative.  That it is essentially individuals working documents, not foundation policy.
+
** [[Portal Translation Status]]
  
 
=User-submitted tasks=
 
=User-submitted tasks=
Line 23: Line 29:
 
==Submitted==
 
==Submitted==
  
* The "upload file" feature seems to insist on giving the error "The file is corrupt or has an incorrect extension. Please check the file and upload again." for any file I try.  Am I doing something wrong, or..? 
+
* Any exisiting or future OSGeo [[Membership Application]] webpage needs to include a "Member Responsibilities" section along with a mechanism(e.g. checkbox) to indicate explicit acceptance of those responsibilities. Existing "Members" should have to edit their membership to also indicate acceptance. This is so that if the " Membership Change and Revocation" issue as mentioned in the [[Proposed_Membership_Rules]] ever arises the Board knows that the Member did agree to 'the rules'.
 
 
* "Upload file" feature is not working.. tried with jpgs and pngs always results in the above error.  -- Mark Lucas
 
 
 
* Any exisiting or future OSGeo 'Member registration' webpage needs to include a "Member Responsibilities" section along with a mechanism(e.g. checkbox) to indicate explicit acceptance of those responsibilities. Existing "Members" should have to edit their membership to also indicate acceptance. This is so that if the " Membership Change and Revocation" issue as mentioned in the [[Proposed_Membership_Rules]] ever arises the Board knows that the Member did agree to 'the rules'.
 
 
 
* I've submitted seven webcommittee Project Tracker artifacts via CollabNet(SC30 through SC36). Not all will be relevant if CN is no longer being used, but these should be reviewed and, if appropriate, added to "the real issue tracker".
 
  
 
==Approved and Pending==
 
==Approved and Pending==
  
 
==Completed for Review==
 
==Completed for Review==

Latest revision as of 00:12, 7 May 2018

Redirect to:

General Direction

Transition Related

  • Approve and post a Privacy Policy. We used to have one similar to http://www.jxta.org/nonav/servlets/LegalNotices?type=PrivacyPolicy on the old site, and might want to emulate it.
  • Provide some mechanism for feedback for the website. Perhaps a "feedback" link that suggests email to info@osgeo.org?
  • Do we need a "terms of use" document? I'm not sure what happened to our old terms of use, but they were partly collabnet oriented.

Current Work

Pending

  • Work on web site overall style. (waiting for decision on tech infrastructure)
  • Organize translation volunteers. (need technical infrastructure for multilang support)

User-submitted tasks

Submitted

  • Any exisiting or future OSGeo Membership Application webpage needs to include a "Member Responsibilities" section along with a mechanism(e.g. checkbox) to indicate explicit acceptance of those responsibilities. Existing "Members" should have to edit their membership to also indicate acceptance. This is so that if the " Membership Change and Revocation" issue as mentioned in the Proposed_Membership_Rules ever arises the Board knows that the Member did agree to 'the rules'.

Approved and Pending

Completed for Review