Difference between revisions of "Web site design"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
−
This wiki is the place where the Marketing Comittee of OSGeo is planning the redesigning of the OSGeo Web site following a user-centered design process (UCD). The main goals of the redesign are to provide:
+
This wiki is the place where the Marketing Comittee of OSGeo is planning the improving the design of the OSGeo Web site following a user-centered design process (UCD).  
 +
 
 +
The reason for redesigning a website is to end up with impact and results, not because there are those bored with the design or because some users want it to be blue not red. It is important to focus on the results we want. 
 +
example, the Amazon website has had very little change for over 10 years. Why? Because it works!
 +
 
 +
 
 +
More '''visitors''', '''leads''', '''contributors''' and '''sponsors''' is the primary goal. Every decision made should be focused on improving this. Keeping that in mind, we might spend a bit less time worrying about the exact shade of blueish-green on the call out background, and more time worrying about things that will improve our marketing results.
 +
 
 +
It is important to analyze what are the assets we have, analyze the website and evaluate what can be improved
 +
 
 +
=Goal=
 +
 
 +
'''Increase Traffic and Leads'''
 +
 
 +
=Secondary Goals=
  
 
     * increased usability of the OSGeo Web site, and
 
     * increased usability of the OSGeo Web site, and
 
     * increased use of the resources on the OSGeo Web site due to better usability.
 
     * increased use of the resources on the OSGeo Web site due to better usability.
 
     * aligning site branding with an official print design
 
     * aligning site branding with an official print design
−
 
−
The reason for redesigning a website is to end up with impact and results, not because there are those bored with the design or because some users want it to be blue not red. It is important to focus on the results we want.
 
−
 
−
More visitors, leads, contributors and sponsors. Every decision made should be focused on improving those goals. Keeping that in mind, we might spend a bit less time worrying about the exact shade of blueish-green on the call out background, and more time worrying about things that will improve our marketing results.
 
  
 
=Members=
 
=Members=
Line 35: Line 45:
  
  
−
==2) Define areas that need improvement==
+
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===1.1) Inventory of OSGeo Website Assets===
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
* '''Content'''
 +
* '''Layout'''
 +
* '''Navigation'''
 +
* '''Visual'''
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===1.2) Define areas that need improvement===
  
 
These are a few comments from some of the Marketing Committee participants
 
These are a few comments from some of the Marketing Committee participants
−
* '''Content Design:'''
+
* '''Content''' - '''''Content drives visitors, search engines like content, websites with more content have more traffic''''' (Volt, M. 2008)
 +
** More
 
** Some of the written content could be summarized
 
** Some of the written content could be summarized
 
** The site is very static and rigid. The community lives somewhere else. Do we want a more active site?
 
** The site is very static and rigid. The community lives somewhere else. Do we want a more active site?
 
** Alter and restructure the "About the Foundation" and "FAQ" materials (w)
 
** Alter and restructure the "About the Foundation" and "FAQ" materials (w)
−
* '''Layout Design:'''
+
* '''Layout'''
−
* '''Navigation Design:'''
+
 
 +
* '''Navigation'''
 +
** Language selection could be made better
 +
**o The navigation menu is not the correct place to put language selection in.
 +
*** A alternative way could be to have a "change language" link in the top banner somewhere, which would take the user to a page like [http://europa.eu/ this].
 
** The Login section is not easy to find on the homepage
 
** The Login section is not easy to find on the homepage
 
** We have a very long menu. It should be shortened.
 
** We have a very long menu. It should be shortened.
−
* '''Visual Design:'''
+
** We should implement a search. Probably google site search.
 +
 
 +
* '''Visual'''
 
** More images may make the website a bit more friendly
 
** More images may make the website a bit more friendly
 
** The site could use more color.
 
** The site could use more color.
Line 55: Line 86:
 
=Ideas=
 
=Ideas=
  
 +
* Content - Outstanding Content!
 
* User centered Design
 
* User centered Design
 
* User testing
 
* User testing
 
* Usability
 
* Usability
 
* Tied to branding of print material
 
* Tied to branding of print material
−
* We should implement a search. Probably google site search.
+
 
−
* Language selection could be made better
 
−
** The navigation menu is not the correct place to put language selection in.
 
−
** A alternative way could be to have a "change language" link in the top banner somewhere, which would take the user to a page like [http://europa.eu/ this].
 
  
 
=Links=
 
=Links=

Revision as of 02:09, 4 February 2009

This wiki is the place where the Marketing Comittee of OSGeo is planning the improving the design of the OSGeo Web site following a user-centered design process (UCD).

The reason for redesigning a website is to end up with impact and results, not because there are those bored with the design or because some users want it to be blue not red. It is important to focus on the results we want. 

example, the Amazon website has had very little change for over 10 years. Why? Because it works!


More visitors, leads, contributors and sponsors is the primary goal. Every decision made should be focused on improving this. Keeping that in mind, we might spend a bit less time worrying about the exact shade of blueish-green on the call out background, and more time worrying about things that will improve our marketing results. 

It is important to analyze what are the assets we have, analyze the website and evaluate what can be improved

Goal

Increase Traffic and Leads

Secondary Goals

   * increased usability of the OSGeo Web site, and
   * increased use of the resources on the OSGeo Web site due to better usability.
   * aligning site branding with an official print design

Members

  • Tyler
  • Daniele
  • Jeroen

Tasks

1) Analysis of the Current website

OSGeo Homepage in Jan 2009



  • Content Design
  • Layout Design
  • Navigation Design
  • Visual Design






1.1) Inventory of OSGeo Website Assets

  • Content
  • Layout
  • Navigation
  • Visual


1.2) Define areas that need improvement

These are a few comments from some of the Marketing Committee participants

  • Content - Content drives visitors, search engines like content, websites with more content have more traffic (Volt, M. 2008)
    • More
    • Some of the written content could be summarized
    • The site is very static and rigid. The community lives somewhere else. Do we want a more active site?
    • Alter and restructure the "About the Foundation" and "FAQ" materials (w)
  • Layout
  • Navigation
    • Language selection could be made better
    • o The navigation menu is not the correct place to put language selection in.
      • A alternative way could be to have a "change language" link in the top banner somewhere, which would take the user to a page like this.
    • The Login section is not easy to find on the homepage
    • We have a very long menu. It should be shortened.
    • We should implement a search. Probably google site search.
  • Visual
    • More images may make the website a bit more friendly
    • The site could use more color.

Projects

Ideas

  • Content - Outstanding Content!
  • User centered Design
  • User testing
  • Usability
  • Tied to branding of print material


Links

Previous discussion

Notes

Retrieved from "http://wiki.osgeo.org/w/index.php?title=Web_site_design&oldid=34983"