Difference between revisions of "Public Geospatial Data Project Update Mission"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wiki-Bitner (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Purpose == | == Purpose == | ||
(Why do we need a Public Geospatial Data Project?) | (Why do we need a Public Geospatial Data Project?) | ||
| − | * Free software is useless without data (from OSGeo Goals) | + | * Free software is useless without data (from OSGeo Goals) |
| − | * Varied sample datasets are critical for GIS education | + | ** bitner +1 |
| − | * Free counterparts to Google Maps and friends are necessary | + | * Varied sample datasets are critical for GIS education |
| − | * Have relationships in place to respond to disasters (bitner +1) | + | ** bitner +1 |
| − | * Show off OSGeo software in action | + | * Free counterparts to Google Maps and friends are necessary |
| − | * Make it easy to find data to use in OSGeo software | + | ** crschmidt +1 |
| − | * Extend Open Source ideals to the data world | + | * Have relationships in place to respond to disasters |
| + | ** (bitner +1) | ||
| + | **(crschmidt +1) | ||
| + | * Show off OSGeo software in action | ||
| + | ** bitner +1 | ||
| + | * Make it easy to find data to use in OSGeo software | ||
| + | ** crschmidt +1 | ||
| + | * Extend Open Source ideals to the data world | ||
| + | ** crschmidt -1 -- 'Open Source ideals' as a statement is too vague to neccesarily apply to data. For example, one of the big things that makes open source 'open source' in my opinion is the ability to modify the code as you see fit. Some geodata -- aerial imagery especially -- doesn't require the ability to 'modify' to be useful, so long as other, more useful, rights are available, like reuse or deriving data from the imagery. | ||
== Tasks == | == Tasks == | ||
(What are we doing to meet the needs?) | (What are we doing to meet the needs?) | ||
* Provide hosting support to mirror large datasets | * Provide hosting support to mirror large datasets | ||
| − | * Provide computing resources and volunteer support to pull together and add value to datasets | + | * Provide computing resources and volunteer support to pull together and add value to datasets |
| + | ** bitner +1 | ||
* Provide forum to create relationships and exercise the ability to come together in disasters | * Provide forum to create relationships and exercise the ability to come together in disasters | ||
* Create multi-resolution datasets and services to provide best available base map data / imagery | * Create multi-resolution datasets and services to provide best available base map data / imagery | ||
| − | * Host applications using free data using OSGeo software | + | * Host applications using free data using OSGeo software |
| + | ** bitner +1 | ||
| + | ** zool +1) | ||
* Offer guidelines for public geodata licensing and help to connect people who are needing and offering advice (zool +1) | * Offer guidelines for public geodata licensing and help to connect people who are needing and offering advice (zool +1) | ||
== Beliefs == | == Beliefs == | ||
(What motivates are work?) | (What motivates are work?) | ||
| − | * Data should be free | + | * Data should be free |
| + | ** bitner +1 | ||
* Standards help the flow of data | * Standards help the flow of data | ||
* Too much wanking keeps things from getting done | * Too much wanking keeps things from getting done | ||
Revision as of 08:27, 28 November 2007
This page is for brainstorming for the purpose of refining the Mission Statement of the OSGeo Public Geospatial Data Project.
Please add any entries to the following sections as well as placing your name and a +1 next to those statements that you feel are *most* important and a -1 next to those statements that you feel should not be part of the Public Geospatial Data Project. Don't hesitate to add any statements that conflict or contradict any of the other statements on the lists - this is for brainstorming.
Purpose
(Why do we need a Public Geospatial Data Project?)
- Free software is useless without data (from OSGeo Goals)
- bitner +1
- Varied sample datasets are critical for GIS education
- bitner +1
- Free counterparts to Google Maps and friends are necessary
- crschmidt +1
- Have relationships in place to respond to disasters
- (bitner +1)
- (crschmidt +1)
- Show off OSGeo software in action
- bitner +1
- Make it easy to find data to use in OSGeo software
- crschmidt +1
- Extend Open Source ideals to the data world
- crschmidt -1 -- 'Open Source ideals' as a statement is too vague to neccesarily apply to data. For example, one of the big things that makes open source 'open source' in my opinion is the ability to modify the code as you see fit. Some geodata -- aerial imagery especially -- doesn't require the ability to 'modify' to be useful, so long as other, more useful, rights are available, like reuse or deriving data from the imagery.
Tasks
(What are we doing to meet the needs?)
- Provide hosting support to mirror large datasets
- Provide computing resources and volunteer support to pull together and add value to datasets
- bitner +1
- Provide forum to create relationships and exercise the ability to come together in disasters
- Create multi-resolution datasets and services to provide best available base map data / imagery
- Host applications using free data using OSGeo software
- bitner +1
- zool +1)
- Offer guidelines for public geodata licensing and help to connect people who are needing and offering advice (zool +1)
Beliefs
(What motivates are work?)
- Data should be free
- bitner +1
- Standards help the flow of data
- Too much wanking keeps things from getting done
- Actions speak louder than words
Hurdles
(What gets in our way?)
- Licensing terms
- Too much talking about what we need to do, and not just doing
- Much of the work is done under different banners