Difference between revisions of "OpenRouter"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 89: Line 89:
 
* Toru Mori - [http://pgrouting.postlbs.org/ pgRouting] | [http://www.orkney.co.jp Orkney]
 
* Toru Mori - [http://pgrouting.postlbs.org/ pgRouting] | [http://www.orkney.co.jp Orkney]
 
* [[Stephen Woodbridge]] - http://imaptools.com/
 
* [[Stephen Woodbridge]] - http://imaptools.com/
 +
* Mirenn McAmara - [http://freewayautoinsurance.net auto insurance]
 
* V.Ravi Kumar - OSGeo India
 
* V.Ravi Kumar - OSGeo India
 
* Dimitris Kotzinos - OSGeo Greece
 
* Dimitris Kotzinos - OSGeo Greece
Line 96: Line 97:
 
* Cédric Moullet - [http://www.camptocamp.com Camptocamp]
 
* Cédric Moullet - [http://www.camptocamp.com Camptocamp]
 
* Robert Hollingsworth
 
* Robert Hollingsworth
 +
* Mirenn McAmara - [http://freewayautoinsurance.net auto insurance]

Revision as of 03:21, 1 September 2010

Special Announcement

FOSS4G2010

FOSS4G 2010 Conference

Open Source Router

For those not familiar with the concept, routing provides the path between two locations. Often there can be criteria considered such as time, cost, and so forth.


Project Purpose

The intention of this project is to work towards creation of open source software providing routing capability.

Design goals

Desired attributes:

  • Library Coded in C (or C wrapper to C++)
  • This library could SWIG wrapped for integration into scripting languages, or used in RDBMS engines like pgRouting in PostgreSQL, or via a command line or webservice tools.
  • Architected and designed for performance. An ideal goal would be to handle graphs in the ballpark of 25-35 million edges and able to generate sub-sec responses.
  • Abstracted storage to allow for use of data from various sources e.g. shapefiles, RDBMS, others
  • Support multiple subject-matter domains, outside of transportation, such as utility and telecom networks

Contact information

Please join us on the mailing list.

NOTE: This mailing list is shared between this project and the OpenGeocoder project.


Relevant Existing Open Source Technologies

Target Licensing

  • Preference for a liberal license to encourage adoption by maximum number of technologies both proprietary and open source


Project Support

Development

The following list are people who are interested in participating in development of this project:

Testing

The following list are people who are interested in participating in testing of this project:

Consumers

The following list are people that plan to make use of this project: