Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G 2014 Bid Process Board Voting"
(add vote results section) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=== Abstension === | === Abstension === | ||
| − | * Mark Lucas, as a Board member and also a member of the DC local committee, will not be allowed to vote | + | * <strike>Mark Lucas, as a Board member and also a member of the DC local committee, will not be allowed to vote</strike> |
| + | * Mark Lucas, while noting he has no financial conflict of interest as described by OSGeo bylaws, has volunteered to abstain in order to address concerns raised by others. | ||
=== Vote Process === | === Vote Process === | ||
We should keep the same voting process as the Conf Comm: please send your | We should keep the same voting process as the Conf Comm: please send your | ||
| − | city selection to Paul as CRO privately. | + | city selection to <strike>Paul</strike> Bart as CRO privately. |
=== Vote Deadline === | === Vote Deadline === | ||
| − | Votes should be sent to Paul by end of next ''' | + | Votes should be sent to <strike>Paul</strike> Bart bartvde[at]osgis.nl by end of <strike>next Monday, the 29th</strike> this '''Friday, Aug 2nd'''. |
=== Tie Breaker === | === Tie Breaker === | ||
Latest revision as of 11:32, 31 July 2013
The OSGeo Conference Committee votes for the 2014 hosting resulted in a tie. A re-vote did not change the outcome. The following is the process used to solve the tie breaker, through a vote by the OSGeo Board.
Board Vote
Voting for where to host the global FOSS4G event is very important, and each Board member must take this responsibility seriously. This means of course reviewing each proposal and budget closely, and reviewing the excellent Q/A already done by the Conf Comm (http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/OSGeo-Conference-Committee-f3721662.html).
Proposal Documents
- available at http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/proposals/2014/
- Board members should also review the 2014 RFP (http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/rfp/2014/), specifically the "Evaluation Criteria" section, on page 9. (as the Conf Comm did, the OSGeo Board must also vote according to the Evaluation Criteria as specified in the RFP)
Abstension
Mark Lucas, as a Board member and also a member of the DC local committee, will not be allowed to vote- Mark Lucas, while noting he has no financial conflict of interest as described by OSGeo bylaws, has volunteered to abstain in order to address concerns raised by others.
Vote Process
We should keep the same voting process as the Conf Comm: please send your
city selection to Paul Bart as CRO privately.
Vote Deadline
Votes should be sent to Paul Bart bartvde[at]osgis.nl by end of next Monday, the 29th this Friday, Aug 2nd.
Tie Breaker
In the case of a tie, the President's vote should count as 1.5 votes.
Vote Results
Individual votes will not be made public afterwards, only the winner will be announced.
Board Q/A
Can occur openly on the Board mailing list.