Difference between revisions of "5-star-rating"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Mail list discussion http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2010-June/thread.html History http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php?title=Marketing_Artefacts&oldid=51118#Maturity_Rating...")
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Compilation
 
Compilation
  
==* beta==
+
NOTE: The ckecklist is adopted from original [[Project_Graduation_Checklist]] wiki page
  
* Project is "beta" software
+
== Purpose ==
* Not released yet
+
The purpose of this checklist is to determine whether in our "Start rating system" the new OSGeo project is to be sorted.
* Although not mature
+
 
* Software is related to ''GIS topic''  
+
See also the Incubation Application Questionnaire
* It's license is ''OSI approved''
+
 
 +
==* alfa==
 +
One star or "alfa" stage project is project, which barely has running code, but it is ''open source'' software with relation to ''geo spatial'' problematic.
 +
 
 +
=== Open ===
 +
 +
The project has demonstrated that it has an open, active and healthy user and developer community:
 +
 +
# <span id="open.1">[open.1]</span> Open: projects are expected to function in an open and public manner and include:
 +
#* <span id="open.1a">[open.1a]</span> Open source license(s),
 +
# <span id="gis.2">[geospatial.2]</span> Geo-spatial: project has some relationship to geo, spatial and similar topics
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
#* <span id="open.2a">[open.2a]</span> The project should have a community of developers and users who actively collaborate and support each other in a healthy way. <br/><i>Eg. collaboration on project activities such as testing, release and feature development.</i>
 +
#* <span id="open.2b">[open.2b]</span> Long term viability of the project is demonstrated by showing participation, <span style="color:red">support</span> and direction from multiple developers, <span style="color:red">and/or power users, and/or sponsors</span>, who come from multiple organisations. <br/><i>Eg. The project is resilient enough to sustain loss of a developer or supporting organisation, often referred to as having a high [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_factor bus factor].</i>
 +
#* <span id="open.2d" style="color:red">[open.2d] Users are supported and encouraged, via an email list or similar.</span>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==** beta==
 +
Software is somehow established, produces new code, attracts new developers and users. Project still does not have to be described as "mature".
 +
 
 +
# <span id="open.1">[open.1]</span> Open: projects are expected to function in an open and public manner and include:
 +
#* <span id="open.1b">[open.1b]</span> Open communication channels,
 +
#* <span id="open.1c">[open.1c]</span> Open decision making process,
 +
# <span id="open.2">[open.2]</span> Community:
 +
#* <span id="open.2c">[open.2c] Decisions are made openly instead of behind closed doors, which empowers all developers to take ownership of the project and facilitates spreading of knowledge between current and future team members.</span>
 +
#* <span id="open.2d" style="color:red">[open.2d] Users are supported and encouraged, via an email list or similar.</span>
 +
# <span id="documentation.1">[documentation.1]</span> The project has user documentation:
  
 
==** stable==
 
==** stable==

Revision as of 02:43, 5 March 2015

Mail list discussion http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2010-June/thread.html

History http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php?title=Marketing_Artefacts&oldid=51118#Maturity_Rating

Compilation

NOTE: The ckecklist is adopted from original Project_Graduation_Checklist wiki page

Purpose

The purpose of this checklist is to determine whether in our "Start rating system" the new OSGeo project is to be sorted.

See also the Incubation Application Questionnaire

* alfa

One star or "alfa" stage project is project, which barely has running code, but it is open source software with relation to geo spatial problematic.

Open

The project has demonstrated that it has an open, active and healthy user and developer community:

  1. [open.1] Open: projects are expected to function in an open and public manner and include:
    • [open.1a] Open source license(s),
  2. [geospatial.2] Geo-spatial: project has some relationship to geo, spatial and similar topics


    • [open.2a] The project should have a community of developers and users who actively collaborate and support each other in a healthy way.
      Eg. collaboration on project activities such as testing, release and feature development.
    • [open.2b] Long term viability of the project is demonstrated by showing participation, support and direction from multiple developers, and/or power users, and/or sponsors, who come from multiple organisations.
      Eg. The project is resilient enough to sustain loss of a developer or supporting organisation, often referred to as having a high bus factor.
    • [open.2d] Users are supported and encouraged, via an email list or similar.


** beta

Software is somehow established, produces new code, attracts new developers and users. Project still does not have to be described as "mature".

  1. [open.1] Open: projects are expected to function in an open and public manner and include:
    • [open.1b] Open communication channels,
    • [open.1c] Open decision making process,
  2. [open.2] Community:
    • [open.2c] Decisions are made openly instead of behind closed doors, which empowers all developers to take ownership of the project and facilitates spreading of knowledge between current and future team members.
    • [open.2d] Users are supported and encouraged, via an email list or similar.
  3. [documentation.1] The project has user documentation:

** stable

  • Bundled software
  • updates
  • Training
  • etc. ...

*** OSGeo project

**** mature

  • Defined release procedure
  • Regular builds
  • Security updates
  • Training
  • Stable community


5 stars: This rating is yet to be defined, and will not be allocated to projects yet. Project includes bundled software, regular builds, security updates, training, etc. 4 stars (mature): 3.5 stars: Not to be used yet, but may later be introduced for projects which have entered incubation. 3 stars (established): Project has Stable Software, a Stable community, is deployed in production systems, and is ready to pass criteria to enter incubation, as per:http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/evaluation.html 2 stars (stable): Project has Stable Software. Project produces periodic releases of stable software which is used in production systems. 1 star (beta): Project has Beta software.