Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G Europe 2015 OSGeo Europe BOF Agenda"
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Minutes of BOF meeting == | == Minutes of BOF meeting == | ||
− | + | * question from Dirk: do we need an OSGeo Europe entity? | |
− | + | ** another org helps to act as legal entity to deal with more local projects | |
− | + | ** lobby in Europe specifically | |
− | + | * Helena: how does this relate to OSGeo? | |
− | + | * Maxi: there are already other OSGeo local chapters as legal entities | |
+ | * Alessandro: not aware of this, in the Italian community. Do we need a legal entity, or just a more organized movement along existing chapters | ||
+ | * Kari: Finnish chapter in formation. Organizing workshops are costly to organize on own, so external funding could help. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * do we need a structure to decide about next OSGeo-Europe hosting decision | ||
+ | ** do we focus on European funding | ||
+ | ** other things to discuss first | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Arnulf: legal entities already exist. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Jeff: focus on what we are good at (building open software). Hesitate to force funding issues on a 100% volunteer organization (OSGeo Europe or OSGeo global). | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Robin: look at leveraging other orgs in our space. | ||
== Description == | == Description == |
Latest revision as of 08:28, 16 July 2015
Agenda:
- A European legal entity representing OSGeo
- SWOT Analysis concerning the foundation of an European legal structure
- mission of a future OSGeo Europe
- Membership discussion: face2face continuation of the thread on the discuss list OSGeo-Discuss 2015 Charter Member elections (here! and here etc)
- Planning of activities and goals for the industry workgroup (in relation with OSGeo Europe?)
Minutes of BOF meeting
- question from Dirk: do we need an OSGeo Europe entity?
- another org helps to act as legal entity to deal with more local projects
- lobby in Europe specifically
- Helena: how does this relate to OSGeo?
- Maxi: there are already other OSGeo local chapters as legal entities
- Alessandro: not aware of this, in the Italian community. Do we need a legal entity, or just a more organized movement along existing chapters
- Kari: Finnish chapter in formation. Organizing workshops are costly to organize on own, so external funding could help.
- do we need a structure to decide about next OSGeo-Europe hosting decision
- do we focus on European funding
- other things to discuss first
- Arnulf: legal entities already exist.
- Jeff: focus on what we are good at (building open software). Hesitate to force funding issues on a 100% volunteer organization (OSGeo Europe or OSGeo global).
- Robin: look at leveraging other orgs in our space.
Description
OSGeo legal structure
I think it is important to create a European legal structure representing OSGeo in Europe, to be able to speak as one voice, and as a legal entity representing OSGeo values to the EU Administration, industry and R&D institutions. OSGeo Europe should give support to OSGeo in lobbying European Union Institutions (Commission, Parliament, etc) related to specific EU-Themes (INSPIRE, H2020, Procurement policy, ...) It can act as an entity to manage H2020 projects, etc... (from the preconference meeting of Geo4All on Tuesday July 14, Como): Osgeo could play a role in encouraging and should be issued by OSGeo. Also here OSGeo-EU legal structure can play a role for Europe.
Planning of activities and goals of the [industry] workgroup
I believe in eco-systems. A system where all the entities are acting in an equal important role in a whole system. Wednesday July 15, I have a presentation: " HOW OPEN SOURCE AND INSPIRE CAN BE USED AS A TACTICAL WEAPON FOR ECONOMICAL GROWTH IN EUROPE" where I want to start a discussion about using open source and open source licenses to support an ecosystem and get more impact as a network of SME's. I think openness to other parts of the eco-system is very important. Bring the different stakeholders together.
The membership discussion.
It is a yearly returning topic about the elections of the charter members and the board. Should there be a membership fee, and/or should we have charter members, where it is not clear that we have a charter. During this topic we have the chance to discuss face2face about this theme.