Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G 2017"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Logo Design: Tense correction.)
(→‎Logo Design: determiner change)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
The '''BLOC''' is pleased to announce a call for logo designs. We need your help to build a strong recognizable logo for FOSS4G Boston 2017.
 
The '''BLOC''' is pleased to announce a call for logo designs. We need your help to build a strong recognizable logo for FOSS4G Boston 2017.
  
We put together this Design Brief (borrowing from the [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2016/Logo_brief SOTM])which outlines what we are looking for in a logo. Entrants could be an individual or team of people, even a design company.
+
We put together this Design Brief (borrowing from the [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2016/Logo_brief SOTM]) that outlines what we are looking for in a logo. Entrants could be an individual or team of people, even a design company.
  
 
All entries will be considered to give copyright ownership to OSGeo so that it can be used across different mediums. Entries need to appear on the wiki page [[FOSS4G 2017/Logo Entries]] by 23:59 UTC (before midnight) on Tuesday, March 1st, 2016. The BLOC will decide by vote which logo to go with.
 
All entries will be considered to give copyright ownership to OSGeo so that it can be used across different mediums. Entries need to appear on the wiki page [[FOSS4G 2017/Logo Entries]] by 23:59 UTC (before midnight) on Tuesday, March 1st, 2016. The BLOC will decide by vote which logo to go with.

Revision as of 17:46, 20 January 2016

Comunity Committee

Logo Design

The BLOC is pleased to announce a call for logo designs. We need your help to build a strong recognizable logo for FOSS4G Boston 2017.

We put together this Design Brief (borrowing from the SOTM) that outlines what we are looking for in a logo. Entrants could be an individual or team of people, even a design company.

All entries will be considered to give copyright ownership to OSGeo so that it can be used across different mediums. Entries need to appear on the wiki page FOSS4G 2017/Logo Entries by 23:59 UTC (before midnight) on Tuesday, March 1st, 2016. The BLOC will decide by vote which logo to go with.

How to enter

  • Create your logo in PNG file format and a scalable file format (either SVG or PDF).
    • If you're not used to scalable formats please still enter the competition as we can try to help.
  • Make your logo available online, one option is to upload it to the OSM Wiki (upload link).
  • Add a link, or include your logo on the wiki page FOSS4G 2017/Logo Entries.

Distribution

The FOSS4G website (www.foss4g.org), flyers, emails, sponsor communications, t-shirts and potentially other conference ‘schwag’ like fabric or plastic bags, keychains, pens etc. Printed material at the conference such as timetable of talks, notebooks, banners and conference guide. Potentially small web-based button images for use on third party websites to promote the conference or fact that someone is speaking there, for placement on blogs and other web pages.

The design MUST

  • Include elements of the OSGeo / FOSS4G "ribbon" as can be seen in all previous conference logos OSGeo-Ribbon.jpg
  • Include themes for Boston
  • Be easily printable on t-shirts with as few colours as possible (no more than 3). This keeps the cost down of printing.
  • Be delivered in PNG file format and a scalable format (SVG or PDF).
  • Not be similar to other mapping conference logos (Where 2.0, ESRI, SOTM...)
  • Not communicate the brand of potential sponsors or related companies

The design MAY

  • Come in different sizes (example: a main logo and a variant for use on small print media such as badges).

The design should communicate

  • Fun
  • Cool
  • Open to all
  • A sense of community
  • The potential of free and open source geospatial tools
  • Sense of learning and education
  • Intelligence
  • Intelligent
  • Trustworthy
  • Global movement

The design should not communicate

  • Corporate / big business (as the sole element)
  • Complexity
  • Expensive
  • For geeks only
  • Closed community