Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G 2009 Abstract Submission Software"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added page about the Abstract Submission Software)
 
(Added missing features paragraph)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
==Features==
 
==Features==
 
*User accounts (with password reset, changing etc)
 
*User accounts (with password reset, changing etc)
*Abstract submissions (incl. editing of already submitted Abstracts)
+
*Abstract submissions with tags support for easier voting (incl. editing of already submitted Abstracts)
 +
*Nice admin interface (thank Django, not me)
 +
*Nice ajaxy interface to vote on Abstracts (that also works without JavaScript)
 +
*Pagination
 +
*Abstracts are presented to the user in random order, but the order is specific to the user
  
==Features that will be implemented soon==
+
==Missing Features==
*Nice ajaxy interface to vote on Abstracts (that also works without JavaScript)
+
*You can't sort the Abstracts as you like (e.g. by author).
 +
*You can't search the Abstracts
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
*The current system is very unflexible. It was coded to do the things that were needed, not for all cases that might occur. Though [[User:Vmische]] thinks that it should be used as a basis for future FOSS4G conferences. The amount of work that would be needed to add functionality like workshop/tutorial submissions is less than the amount to configure OCS.
+
*The current system is inflexible. It was coded to do the things that were needed, not for all cases that might occur. Though [[User:Vmische]] thinks that it should be used as a basis for future FOSS4G conferences. The amount of work that would be needed to add functionality like workshop/tutorial submissions is less than the amount to configure OCS.
 +
 
 +
===For next year===
 +
*Make it possible to have more than one person per submission.
 +
*Store date when the Abstract was submitted
 +
[[Category:FOSS4G2009]]

Latest revision as of 22:48, 26 March 2010

OCS isn't suitable for a non-scientific conference like the FOSS4G. It has all the features we don't need but not the features we need. Therefore the website team decided to code a custom solution based on Django. It's develped by User:Vmische.

Features

  • User accounts (with password reset, changing etc)
  • Abstract submissions with tags support for easier voting (incl. editing of already submitted Abstracts)
  • Nice admin interface (thank Django, not me)
  • Nice ajaxy interface to vote on Abstracts (that also works without JavaScript)
  • Pagination
  • Abstracts are presented to the user in random order, but the order is specific to the user

Missing Features

  • You can't sort the Abstracts as you like (e.g. by author).
  • You can't search the Abstracts

Notes

  • The current system is inflexible. It was coded to do the things that were needed, not for all cases that might occur. Though User:Vmische thinks that it should be used as a basis for future FOSS4G conferences. The amount of work that would be needed to add functionality like workshop/tutorial submissions is less than the amount to configure OCS.

For next year

  • Make it possible to have more than one person per submission.
  • Store date when the Abstract was submitted