Difference between revisions of "Geodata Committee Tenth Meeting"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wiki-JoWalsh (talk | contribs) (→Agenda) |
m (→Agenda) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
** http://project.knowledgeforge.net/geometa/trac/ | ** http://project.knowledgeforge.net/geometa/trac/ | ||
* How to express "accuracy" and "quality" of geodata in metadata? Prior art required | * How to express "accuracy" and "quality" of geodata in metadata? Prior art required | ||
| − | ''<bitner> perhaps keep the geonerdy representations in the metadata, but | + | :: ''<bitner> perhaps keep the geonerdy representations in the metadata, but '' |
| − | + | :: ''build a catalogue of use scenarios and as Geo-Professionals determine '' | |
| − | + | :: ''what we feel are the appropriate scale numbers or ground error numbers '' | |
| − | + | :: ''are appropriate for those'' | |
| − | |||
| − | '' | ||
* Next steps for formalising dclite4g schema | * Next steps for formalising dclite4g schema | ||
** Extracting something specification-like from [[Geodata Metadata Requirements]] | ** Extracting something specification-like from [[Geodata Metadata Requirements]] | ||
** Implementations | ** Implementations | ||
* We will need to replace the http://geodata.osgeo.org/ website soon - any suggestions for a shiny new one, both form and content would be appreciated | * We will need to replace the http://geodata.osgeo.org/ website soon - any suggestions for a shiny new one, both form and content would be appreciated | ||
Revision as of 19:02, 14 December 2006
Metadata
Chair: Jo Walsh IRC: #osgeo channel on irc.freenode.org (or via Web based IRC client) Date: 2006-December-14 (at least in the Americas and Europe) Time: 1600 GMT / 1100 East Coast / 1700 Europe (fixed time)
Agenda
- Update on GeoNetwork installation at telascience, what are next steps
- State of play @ Telascience
- Which servers and other resources are available or in use?
- State of currently hosted data sets: BMNG, VMap0, ?
- Plans for future data sets: LandSat, ?
- does everyone who wants access know where to look
- Update on geometadata generation utilities
- How to express "accuracy" and "quality" of geodata in metadata? Prior art required
- <bitner> perhaps keep the geonerdy representations in the metadata, but
- build a catalogue of use scenarios and as Geo-Professionals determine
- what we feel are the appropriate scale numbers or ground error numbers
- are appropriate for those
- Next steps for formalising dclite4g schema
- Extracting something specification-like from Geodata Metadata Requirements
- Implementations
- We will need to replace the http://geodata.osgeo.org/ website soon - any suggestions for a shiny new one, both form and content would be appreciated