Difference between revisions of "New York Code Sprint 2010 Agenda"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
* ...
 
* ...
 +
* http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/wiki/DevelopmentDiscussion
 
* lwgeom API discussion, naming conventions, new functions needed
 
* lwgeom API discussion, naming conventions, new functions needed
 
* lwgeom move to GBOX
 
* lwgeom move to GBOX

Revision as of 11:49, 4 February 2010

Theme

New York Code Sprint 2010 : Making things work together better...

Interoperability makes all the pieces more valuable. With multiple applications represented, this is a great time to fix nagging interoperation issues!

MapServer

  • ...
  • KML Mapserver, merge David Kana's soc work into trunk - Mike Smith, Thomas B., Y Assefa
  • XML Mapfile format - Mike Smith
  • rendering plugins:
    • migrate AGG rendering, implementations for legend and scalebar, hatch symbology - Steve L, Thomas B.
    • migrate raster layer handling, but FrankW won't be here
  • object references RFC and implementation (e.g. sharing style or label objects) - Steve L.
  • buffer geotransform implementation - Steve L.
  • bug squashing party - Daniel M.
  • SVG Symbols support (what to do with the outcome of this GSoC project?) - Daniel M, Y Assefa.
  • see if we could make any progress towards a mechanism to show/hide layers in OGC services - Daniel M.

PostGIS

OpenLayers

  • ...

libLAS

  • see if there's anything I can do to help out on the Isenberg front (mpg)

Geoserver

  • ...

GEOS

  • ...

Proj4

  • ...

GDAL

  • evaluate feature set of NITF driver (mpg)
  • think about JPEG XR a bit (mpg)
  • understand the 3-band-at-once fix for MrSID (et al) driver (mpg)

GRASS

  • fix r.in.gdal : subdataset handling (GDAL #486, GRASS #798)