Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G 2011 Workshops Meetings"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
= Previous IRC meetings =
 
= Previous IRC meetings =
 +
 +
* [http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2011&month=02&day=08&hour=17&min=0&sec=0 Feb 8 2011, 10AM MST]
 +
** Agenda
 +
*** Late Submissions
 +
**** Jeff received another late submission, how shall this be handled?
 +
*** Discounts for workshop/tutorial presenters
 +
**** Still not definitive, but close
 +
*** Proposal evaluation process
 +
**** Need to get this started, deadline 16 Feb. 2011
 +
*** Venue logistics (Update on computers)
 +
*** Questions from workshop submitters.
 +
*** other?
 +
** Tasks
 +
*** Discuss number of tutorials with LOC (thinking about 20).
 +
** Log
 +
*** [http://logs.qgis.org/foss4g/%23foss4g.2011-02-08.log Log]
  
 
* [http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2011&month=02&day=01&hour=17&min=0&sec=0 Feb 1 2011, 10AM MST]
 
* [http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2011&month=02&day=01&hour=17&min=0&sec=0 Feb 1 2011, 10AM MST]

Revision as of 10:01, 8 February 2011

  • Meetings occur through IRC chat in channel #foss4g on freenode.net
    • you can use Chatzilla for Firefox, or directly in your browser with webchat


Next IRC meeting

  • Feb 8 2011, 10AM MST
    • Agenda
      • Late Submissions
        • Jeff received another late submission, how shall this be handled?
      • Discounts for workshop/tutorial presenters
        • Still not definitive, but close
      • Proposal evaluation process
        • Need to get this started, deadline 16 Feb. 2011
      • Venue logistics (Update on computers)
      • Questions from workshop submitters.
      • other?

Previous IRC meetings

  • Feb 8 2011, 10AM MST
    • Agenda
      • Late Submissions
        • Jeff received another late submission, how shall this be handled?
      • Discounts for workshop/tutorial presenters
        • Still not definitive, but close
      • Proposal evaluation process
        • Need to get this started, deadline 16 Feb. 2011
      • Venue logistics (Update on computers)
      • Questions from workshop submitters.
      • other?
    • Tasks
      • Discuss number of tutorials with LOC (thinking about 20).
    • Log
  • Feb 1 2011, 10AM MST
    • Agenda
      • Discounts for workshop/tutorial presenters
      • Starting the proposal evaluation process
      • Venue logistics (Computers/Number of concurrent and total sessions)
      • How to deal with late submissions?
      • Questions from workshop submitters.
      • other?
    • Tasks
      • Look into upgrading the laptops from the current specs
      • Discuss volunteer committee with the LOC and possible student passes for volunteers.
      • What are the final discounts for presenters (Discuss with the LOC)
    • Logs
  • Jan 25 2011, 10AM MST
    • Agenda
      • discounts for workshop/tutorial presenters
      • proposal evaluation process
      • venue logistics
    • Outcome
      • Proposal evaluation will be ranked by the workshop committee plus the conference chair and then presented to the LOC for input.
      • Each evaluator will rank the proposals: 15 points for the best ones, 14 for the second, and so on...
    • Tasks
      • Review proposal submissions for under represented projects and send out reminders if needed (Complete by 26 January 2011)
      • Discuss discounts for presenters with the LOC (Does this include tutorial presenters as well as workshop presenters?).
      • Discuss venue logistics with LOC, need more details.
        • After the LOC meeting we seem good for 4 sessions of 6 workshops, could maybe add more if needed. Should be fine to have GITA install an image on all the workshop computers.
    • Logs


  • Jan 18 2011, 10AM MST
    • Tasks:
      • Get access to the current workshop submissions and share via Google Docs
      • Get more information about the venue (workstation specs, access, size of rooms, etc.)
      • Consider quota for innovative workshops this year
      • Send out workshop call reminders/nudges to unrepresented projects if needed
      • Decide on the review process to rank proposals
    • Logs