Difference between revisions of "Geoservices REST API"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
= Open Letter to OGC and voting members =
 
= Open Letter to OGC and voting members =
We, the undersigned have serious concerns related to the proposed approval of the "Geoservices REST API" as an OGC standard. If approved, we believe it will have costly, far reaching, negative impacts on interoperability, and significantly tarnish the OGC’s reputation as a champion of interoperability.
+
May 2013
  
Some of the reasons for our concern include some of the following:
+
We, the undersigned, have concerns that approving the "Geoservices REST API" as an OGC standard, would have detrimental impacts on interoperability within the spatial industry.
*
+
 
...
+
We strongly urge that the proposed standard be rejected in its current form.
 +
 
 +
People have listed different reasons for concern. They are expanded upon below.
  
 
== Signed ==
 
== Signed ==
 +
Please include name, work title (if appropriate), very brief title/involvement in OSGeo if appropriate. Eg: developer on X and Y. (Link to OSGeo profile if appropriate). You may sign as a group, such as the Project Steering Committee of XXX project if you wish, or as Your Name on behalf of YYY company.
 +
 
* [[User:camerons|Cameron Shorter]], Geospatial Solutions Director at LISAsoft, core contributor & coordinator of [http://live.osgeo.org OSGeo-Live]
 
* [[User:camerons|Cameron Shorter]], Geospatial Solutions Director at LISAsoft, core contributor & coordinator of [http://live.osgeo.org OSGeo-Live]
*  
+
*
  
 
= Executive Summary =
 
= Executive Summary =

Revision as of 14:34, 7 May 2013

This wiki page aims to collate community concerns related to the proposed acceptance of the "Geoservices REST API" becoming an OGC standard.

Issues related to proposed "Geoservices REST API" becoming an OGC standard

May 2013

___ DRAFT ____

Open Letter to OGC and voting members

May 2013

We, the undersigned, have concerns that approving the "Geoservices REST API" as an OGC standard, would have detrimental impacts on interoperability within the spatial industry.

We strongly urge that the proposed standard be rejected in its current form.

People have listed different reasons for concern. They are expanded upon below.

Signed

Please include name, work title (if appropriate), very brief title/involvement in OSGeo if appropriate. Eg: developer on X and Y. (Link to OSGeo profile if appropriate). You may sign as a group, such as the Project Steering Committee of XXX project if you wish, or as Your Name on behalf of YYY company.

Executive Summary

Political Concerns

Commercial Concerns

Technical Concerns

History

Todo: please expand