Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G 2009 Abstract Submission Software"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Features) |
(Voting, tagging, pagination was implemented) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Features== | ==Features== | ||
*User accounts (with password reset, changing etc) | *User accounts (with password reset, changing etc) | ||
− | *Abstract submissions (incl. editing of already submitted Abstracts) | + | *Abstract submissions with tags support for easier voting (incl. editing of already submitted Abstracts) |
*Nice admin interface (thank Django, not me) | *Nice admin interface (thank Django, not me) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
*Nice ajaxy interface to vote on Abstracts (that also works without JavaScript) | *Nice ajaxy interface to vote on Abstracts (that also works without JavaScript) | ||
+ | *Pagination | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
− | *The current system is | + | *The current system is nflexible. It was coded to do the things that were needed, not for all cases that might occur. Though [[User:Vmische]] thinks that it should be used as a basis for future FOSS4G conferences. The amount of work that would be needed to add functionality like workshop/tutorial submissions is less than the amount to configure OCS. |
[[Category:FOSS4G2009]] | [[Category:FOSS4G2009]] |
Revision as of 10:41, 23 March 2009
OCS isn't suitable for a non-scientific conference like the FOSS4G. It has all the features we don't need but not the features we need. Therefore the website team decided to code a custom solution based on Django. It's develped by User:Vmische.
- Repository: http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/2009/django/
- Instance for FOSS4G2009: http://dev.extranet.lisasoft.com/foss4g/
- License: It'll be licensed under MIT.
Features
- User accounts (with password reset, changing etc)
- Abstract submissions with tags support for easier voting (incl. editing of already submitted Abstracts)
- Nice admin interface (thank Django, not me)
- Nice ajaxy interface to vote on Abstracts (that also works without JavaScript)
- Pagination
Notes
- The current system is nflexible. It was coded to do the things that were needed, not for all cases that might occur. Though User:Vmische thinks that it should be used as a basis for future FOSS4G conferences. The amount of work that would be needed to add functionality like workshop/tutorial submissions is less than the amount to configure OCS.