Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G 2011 Denver Attendance Projections"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wiki-Ebwolf (talk | contribs) |
Wiki-Ebwolf (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
"Accurate" attendance projections are extremely important to the early success of a conference the size of FOSS4G. | "Accurate" attendance projections are extremely important to the early success of a conference the size of FOSS4G. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| border="1" | ||
+ | !+ Past FOSS4G data | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | !Year!!Country!!Local!!CAN!!USA!!Other!!Total | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |2006||Switzerland||156||37||52||320||565 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |2007||Canada||253||253||265||203||721 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |2008||South Africa||321||17||31||178||547 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |2009||Australia||218||24||28||166||436 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |2010||Spain||???||???||???||???||??? | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Overall, FOSS4G is a highly "local" event with at least 57% of attendees from the host region and 25% of attendees from the host country. | ||
+ | |||
==Brain Storming== | ==Brain Storming== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Survey=== | ||
+ | An alternate method would be to use a short survey that is widely publicized. This could generate good numbers for the FOSS4G community but would miss the non-community members. | ||
===Formula=== | ===Formula=== | ||
Line 15: | Line 37: | ||
* D = Travel Cost Distance from country | * D = Travel Cost Distance from country | ||
** Price of airfare in local currency (somewhat intractable, proxy?) | ** Price of airfare in local currency (somewhat intractable, proxy?) | ||
+ | ** Effort in getting VISA | ||
* E = Some unknown general economic factor | * E = Some unknown general economic factor | ||
+ | ** FOSS4G 2009 realized very low numbers due to the economic crisis | ||
** DJIA? | ** DJIA? | ||
Line 32: | Line 56: | ||
*Number of Code Contributors | *Number of Code Contributors | ||
**Which projects? | **Which projects? | ||
− | + | *Should most countries be "ignored"? | |
+ | **"Top 10" countries provide 75% of attendees | ||
+ | **"Top 20" countries provide 90% of attendees | ||
+ | **"Top 30" countries provide 95% of attendees | ||
+ | *Calculate for the Top 10 and extrapolate as 75% | ||
====By Region==== | ====By Region==== | ||
*Distance | *Distance | ||
*Industrialization | *Industrialization | ||
+ | *Oddly, Europe | ||
==Venue== | ==Venue== |
Revision as of 15:08, 2 June 2010
Attendance Projections
"Accurate" attendance projections are extremely important to the early success of a conference the size of FOSS4G.
+ Past FOSS4G data | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Country | Local | CAN | USA | Other | Total |
2006 | Switzerland | 156 | 37 | 52 | 320 | 565 |
2007 | Canada | 253 | 253 | 265 | 203 | 721 |
2008 | South Africa | 321 | 17 | 31 | 178 | 547 |
2009 | Australia | 218 | 24 | 28 | 166 | 436 |
2010 | Spain | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? |
- Overall, FOSS4G is a highly "local" event with at least 57% of attendees from the host region and 25% of attendees from the host country.
Brain Storming
Survey
An alternate method would be to use a short survey that is widely publicized. This could generate good numbers for the FOSS4G community but would miss the non-community members.
Formula
A = ((P * I) / (D)) * 1/E
Where
- A = number of attendees from a country
- P = population of a country
- I = Industrialization
- GDP of the country
- D = Travel Cost Distance from country
- Price of airfare in local currency (somewhat intractable, proxy?)
- Effort in getting VISA
- E = Some unknown general economic factor
- FOSS4G 2009 realized very low numbers due to the economic crisis
- DJIA?
Will this work for States within the USA?
Correlating Factors
- Economic Crisis
By Country
- Population
- Industrialization
- GDP as proxy
- Distance
- Local vs. Distant
- What is "local"?
- Number of Code Contributors
- Which projects?
- Should most countries be "ignored"?
- "Top 10" countries provide 75% of attendees
- "Top 20" countries provide 90% of attendees
- "Top 30" countries provide 95% of attendees
- Calculate for the Top 10 and extrapolate as 75%
By Region
- Distance
- Industrialization
- Oddly, Europe
Venue
One of the biggest decisions is what venue to hold the conference. Venues with larger capacities have a higher per-attendee cost. If we can come up with a reasonable range of number of attendees, we can make a better decision about the venue. The availability of a particular venue can also impact dates.
In Denver, there are several prospective venues:
- Colorado Convention Center
- Largest space: 5000 people
- Near light rail
- Denver Sheraton
- Largest space: 3000 people
- Near light rail
- Denver Tech Center Marriott
- Largest space: 1500 people
- Near light rail
- Denver Tech Center Hyatt Regency
- Largest space: 1350 people
- Near light rail
- Denver Rennaissance
- Largest space: 1200 people
- Not near light rail
- Sheraton Denver West
- Largest space: 750 people
- New light rail station won't be operational until 2013
- Inverness Hotel and Conference Center
- Largest space: 600 people
- Near light rail