Difference between revisions of "WebComTODO"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wiki-Dpatton (talk | contribs) (add item re "Member Responsibilities") |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* "Upload file" feature is not working.. tried with jpgs and pngs always results in the above error. -- Mark Lucas | * "Upload file" feature is not working.. tried with jpgs and pngs always results in the above error. -- Mark Lucas | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Any exisiting or future OSGeo 'Member registration' webpage needs to include a "Member Responsibilities" section along with a mechanism(e.g. checkbox) to indicate explicit acceptance of those responsibilities. Existing "Members" should have to edit their membership to also indicate acceptance. This is so that if the " Membership Change and Revocation" issue as mentioned in the [[Proposed_Membership_Rules]] ever arises the Board knows that the Member did agree to 'the rules'. | ||
==Approved and Pending== | ==Approved and Pending== | ||
==Completed for Review== | ==Completed for Review== |
Revision as of 12:14, 28 June 2006
This page tracks both general direction and user-submitted tasks for WebCom
General Direction
Current Work
- Flesh out the generic web site pages. New, about, contact, etc.
- Set up site structure to provide Compass-like navigation
Pending
- Work on web site overall style. (waiting for decision on tech infrastructure)
- Organize translation volunteers. (need technical infrastructure for multilang support)
- We need some mechanism(s) to ensure the folks realize material in the wiki is not authoritative. That it is essentially individuals working documents, not foundation policy.
User-submitted tasks
Submitted
- The "upload file" feature seems to insist on giving the error "The file is corrupt or has an incorrect extension. Please check the file and upload again." for any file I try. Am I doing something wrong, or..?
- "Upload file" feature is not working.. tried with jpgs and pngs always results in the above error. -- Mark Lucas
- Any exisiting or future OSGeo 'Member registration' webpage needs to include a "Member Responsibilities" section along with a mechanism(e.g. checkbox) to indicate explicit acceptance of those responsibilities. Existing "Members" should have to edit their membership to also indicate acceptance. This is so that if the " Membership Change and Revocation" issue as mentioned in the Proposed_Membership_Rules ever arises the Board knows that the Member did agree to 'the rules'.