Difference between revisions of "Geoservices REST API"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
 
We strongly urge that the proposed standard be rejected in its current form.
 
We strongly urge that the proposed standard be rejected in its current form.
  
People have listed different reasons for concern. They are expanded upon below.
+
People have listed different reasons for concern. They are described below.
  
 
== Signed ==
 
== Signed ==

Revision as of 14:44, 7 May 2013

This wiki page aims to collate community concerns related to the proposed acceptance of the "Geoservices REST API" becoming an OGC standard.

Issues related to proposed "Geoservices REST API" becoming an OGC standard

May 2013

___ DRAFT ____

Open Letter to OGC and voting members

Please don't edit this "Open Letter" statement, comments and discussion should go below.

May 2013

We, the undersigned, have concerns that approving the "Geoservices REST API" as an OGC standard, would have detrimental impacts on interoperability within the spatial industry.

We strongly urge that the proposed standard be rejected in its current form.

People have listed different reasons for concern. They are described below.

Signed

Please add your name here if you agree with the above statement. Include name, work title (if appropriate), very brief title/involvement in OSGeo if appropriate. (Link to OSGeo profile if appropriate). You may sign as a group, such as the Project Steering Committee of XXX project if you wish, or as Your Name on behalf of YYY company.

Concerns

Please add concerns as bullet points below. Try to be concise. Where appropriate, link to external web pages (such as email achieves)

Summary

To do: Add a brief 3 paragraphs or so summarising the issues.

Political Concerns

Commercial Concerns

Technical Concerns

History

Todo: please expand

References

Todo: Link to key external docs, such as the proposed standards