Difference between revisions of "OGC XML Schemas and FOSS4G Software Distribution"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
FOSS4G software may encounter distribution issues when including OGC Schemas as part of the codebase.
 
FOSS4G software may encounter distribution issues when including OGC Schemas as part of the codebase.
  
=Use of OGC XML Schemas in FOSS4G Implementations=
+
==Use of OGC XML Schemas in FOSS4G Implementations==
  
 
* used to re-publish schemas:
 
* used to re-publish schemas:
Line 18: Line 18:
 
* used within software to perform XML schema validity of XML based HTTP requests
 
* used within software to perform XML schema validity of XML based HTTP requests
 
* others?
 
* others?
 +
 +
=Distribution=
 +
 +
==Debian==
 +
 +
Examples of rejection by Debian:
 +
* pycsw: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-November/024520.html
 +
* TinyOWS: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-January/017321.html
 +
  
 
=Current Text=
 
=Current Text=
  
 
=Proposed Text=
 
=Proposed Text=

Revision as of 12:06, 16 February 2015

Background

Blogpost: http://www.how2map.com/2015/02/a-good-test-for-ogc-and-osgeo.html

Discussion on OSGeo-Standards mailing list: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/OGC-XML-schemas-and-FOSS4G-software-distribution-td5186023.html

This issue is not new, however was raised in the OSGeo Standards mailing list as a result of the pycsw Incubation process

Problem Statement

FOSS4G software may encounter distribution issues when including OGC Schemas as part of the codebase.

Use of OGC XML Schemas in FOSS4G Implementations

Distribution

Debian

Examples of rejection by Debian:


Current Text

Proposed Text