Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G 2009 Abstract Submission Software"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added page about the Abstract Submission Software)
 
(Added FOSS4G2009 Category)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
*The current system is very unflexible. It was coded to do the things that were needed, not for all cases that might occur. Though [[User:Vmische]] thinks that it should be used as a basis for future FOSS4G conferences. The amount of work that would be needed to add functionality like workshop/tutorial submissions is less than the amount to configure OCS.
 
*The current system is very unflexible. It was coded to do the things that were needed, not for all cases that might occur. Though [[User:Vmische]] thinks that it should be used as a basis for future FOSS4G conferences. The amount of work that would be needed to add functionality like workshop/tutorial submissions is less than the amount to configure OCS.
 +
 +
[[Category:FOSS4G2009]]

Revision as of 07:53, 16 March 2009

OCS isn't suitable for a non-scientific conference like the FOSS4G. It has all the features we don't need but not the features we need. Therefore the website team decided to code a custom solution based on Django. It's develped by User:Vmische.

Features

  • User accounts (with password reset, changing etc)
  • Abstract submissions (incl. editing of already submitted Abstracts)

Features that will be implemented soon

  • Nice ajaxy interface to vote on Abstracts (that also works without JavaScript)

Notes

  • The current system is very unflexible. It was coded to do the things that were needed, not for all cases that might occur. Though User:Vmische thinks that it should be used as a basis for future FOSS4G conferences. The amount of work that would be needed to add functionality like workshop/tutorial submissions is less than the amount to configure OCS.