Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G 2009 Abstract Submission Software"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added missing features paragraph)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
 
*Nice ajaxy interface to vote on Abstracts (that also works without JavaScript)
 
*Nice ajaxy interface to vote on Abstracts (that also works without JavaScript)
 
*Pagination
 
*Pagination
 +
*Abstracts are presented to the user in random order, but the order is specific to the user
 +
 +
==Missing Features==
 +
*You can't sort the Abstracts as you like (e.g. by author).
 +
*You can't search the Abstracts
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
*The current system is nflexible. It was coded to do the things that were needed, not for all cases that might occur. Though [[User:Vmische]] thinks that it should be used as a basis for future FOSS4G conferences. The amount of work that would be needed to add functionality like workshop/tutorial submissions is less than the amount to configure OCS.
+
*The current system is inflexible. It was coded to do the things that were needed, not for all cases that might occur. Though [[User:Vmische]] thinks that it should be used as a basis for future FOSS4G conferences. The amount of work that would be needed to add functionality like workshop/tutorial submissions is less than the amount to configure OCS.
  
 
===For next year===
 
===For next year===

Latest revision as of 23:48, 26 March 2010

OCS isn't suitable for a non-scientific conference like the FOSS4G. It has all the features we don't need but not the features we need. Therefore the website team decided to code a custom solution based on Django. It's develped by User:Vmische.

Features

  • User accounts (with password reset, changing etc)
  • Abstract submissions with tags support for easier voting (incl. editing of already submitted Abstracts)
  • Nice admin interface (thank Django, not me)
  • Nice ajaxy interface to vote on Abstracts (that also works without JavaScript)
  • Pagination
  • Abstracts are presented to the user in random order, but the order is specific to the user

Missing Features

  • You can't sort the Abstracts as you like (e.g. by author).
  • You can't search the Abstracts

Notes

  • The current system is inflexible. It was coded to do the things that were needed, not for all cases that might occur. Though User:Vmische thinks that it should be used as a basis for future FOSS4G conferences. The amount of work that would be needed to add functionality like workshop/tutorial submissions is less than the amount to configure OCS.

For next year

  • Make it possible to have more than one person per submission.
  • Store date when the Abstract was submitted