Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G 2009 Workshop Selection Criteria"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Criteria used for ranking workshops and tutorials The following criteria will be scored: 1. Basic themes 1.1 Meets the conference theme, "User Driven" 1.2 Makes use of FOSS software 1.3 ...)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
The following criteria will be scored:
 
The following criteria will be scored:
  
1. Basic themes
+
{|
1.1 Meets the conference theme, "User Driven"
+
|-
1.2 Makes use of FOSS software
+
| 1.  
1.3 Promotes FOSS software
+
|
2. Workshop
+
| Basic themes
2.1 Technical requirements can be met by the conference facilities
+
|-
2.2 Demonstrates practical application
+
|
2.3 Feedback / evaluations from previous conferences for similar workshop topic
+
| 1.1  
3 Instructor(s)
+
| Meets the conference theme, "User Driven"
3.1 Expertise in the topics discussed
+
|-
3.2 Previous presentation experience
+
|
3.3 Feedback / evaluations from previous conferences
+
| 1.2  
 +
| Makes use of FOSS software
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| 1.3  
 +
| Promotes FOSS software
 +
|-
 +
| 2.  
 +
|
 +
| Workshop
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| 2.1  
 +
| Technical requirements can be met by the conference facilities
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| 2.2  
 +
| Demonstrates practical application
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| 2.3  
 +
| Feedback / evaluations from previous conferences for similar workshop topic
 +
|-
 +
| 3.
 +
|
 +
| Instructor(s)
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| 3.1  
 +
| Expertise in the topics discussed
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| 3.2  
 +
| Previous presentation experience
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| 3.3  
 +
| Feedback / evaluations from previous conferences
 +
|}

Revision as of 16:52, 22 January 2009

Criteria used for ranking workshops and tutorials

The following criteria will be scored:

1. Basic themes
1.1 Meets the conference theme, "User Driven"
1.2 Makes use of FOSS software
1.3 Promotes FOSS software
2. Workshop
2.1 Technical requirements can be met by the conference facilities
2.2 Demonstrates practical application
2.3 Feedback / evaluations from previous conferences for similar workshop topic
3. Instructor(s)
3.1 Expertise in the topics discussed
3.2 Previous presentation experience
3.3 Feedback / evaluations from previous conferences