Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G Reboot 2011"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== Observations by Paul Ramsey --
+
== Observations by Paul Ramsey ==
  
 
* The international FOSS4G conference continues to be popular and useful as a global meeting of the tribes, bringing together people from multiple continents who might otherwise never meet.
 
* The international FOSS4G conference continues to be popular and useful as a global meeting of the tribes, bringing together people from multiple continents who might otherwise never meet.

Revision as of 12:35, 2 April 2009

Observations by Paul Ramsey

  • The international FOSS4G conference continues to be popular and useful as a global meeting of the tribes, bringing together people from multiple continents who might otherwise never meet.
  • The demand for FOSS4G-like events is high, and the ability of all people interested in the topic to travel to the international conference is constrained.
  • Successful regional conferences can drain attendance from FOSS4G. For example, compare the population and open source interest in Germany with their FOSS4G attendance. Germany has a successful annual FOSSGIS.
  • Even with a strict regional allocation policy of North America-Europe-Other, each region would only be seeing a conference every three years, which is a very long time in technology.
  • The current bid system is competitive and heavy-weight because of high regional demand for the conference. Everyone preparing a bid wants to win, so everyone errs on the side of doing the most comprehensive and complete response possible. With lots of bids, that means lots of wasted effort.

For 2011, something needs to change.

Options

A. Modified Status Quo

  • Continue to run an annual international conference.
  • Revise the bid process to lower the initial overhead.
    • Add an "expression of interest" phase, where locations provide a snapshot of the bid committee, chosen venue/city, and local community only, from which one or two groups are selected to provide a full proposal.
  • Encourage local chapters to hold one "event" per year as part of their "chapterness".

B. Two Track Strategy

  • Expand the FOSS4G brand into two events "FOSS4G International" and "FOSS4G _____ Region" and hold the events in alternating years.
  • FOSS4G 2010 would become "FOSS4G International" and the 2011 year would be the first regional year.
  • Use an "expression of interest" bid process for regional events, trying to corral multiple bids into joint efforts.
  • Provide up to $5000 seed money for each regional event, in return for budgeting that favors break-even/slight profit to return investment-plus to OSGeo.
  • Try to ensure each regional round includes a North America, Europe, and Asia event, and hope to also have South America, Africa, India, or China events.

C. Both Annual and Regional Events in Same Year

  • Same as Option A, but OSGeo would also support regional conferences in the same year as the annual conference