Difference between revisions of "Live GIS Disc Press Release 75"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
We are faced with the choices of:
 
We are faced with the choices of:
 
# Reduce quality.  
 
# Reduce quality.  
#* Not being considered.
+
#* Not being considered, as quality is high priority.
 
# Become more efficient:
 
# Become more efficient:
 
#* Done already.
 
#* Done already.
 
# Increase volunteer engagement:
 
# Increase volunteer engagement:
#* Volunteers always welcomed.
+
#* Volunteers are always welcomed.
 
# Find a sponsor to support core activities:
 
# Find a sponsor to support core activities:
 
#* Would be awesome, but we're not counting on this.
 
#* Would be awesome, but we're not counting on this.
Line 23: Line 23:
 
#* This is our most viable option.
 
#* This is our most viable option.
  
Projects being considered to be kept:
+
Questions we will ask for each project:
#
+
# Is there an active OSGeo-Live liaison person for the project?
 
+
# Has the Project Overview and Qucikstart been reviewed and are they current and complete?
Projects being considered for retirement:
+
# Do OpenHub metrics reflect an active and healthy community: https://live.osgeo.org/en/metrics.html
# <project> : <reason> (including issue number if applicable)
+
# Is the project being updated on OSGeo-Live with each release?
  
 
==Key Milestones==
 
==Key Milestones==
  
xx
+
5-Jun-2017 OSGeo-Live Feature Freeze (final application versions installed)
 +
: 19-Jun-2017 OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final application versions installed - Beta stage)
 +
: 24-Jul-2017 OSGeo-Live Final ISO
 +
: 14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017 Boston
  
 
[http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB ... full schedule]
 
[http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB ... full schedule]

Revision as of 04:13, 12 April 2017

Descoping OSGeo-Live for next 11.0 release

18 April 2017

For our next OSGeo-Live release, 11.0, we propose to de-scope what is included.

Factors leading to this suggestion include:

  1. Some projects have dwindling communities and momentum.
  2. Increased OSGeo-Live scope has increased our core maintenance and testing.
  3. Reduced engagement from projects (partly due to less core time spent reaching out to projects)
  4. Missing our first release milestone in 9 years.

We are faced with the choices of:

  1. Reduce quality.
    • Not being considered, as quality is high priority.
  2. Become more efficient:
    • Done already.
  3. Increase volunteer engagement:
    • Volunteers are always welcomed.
  4. Find a sponsor to support core activities:
    • Would be awesome, but we're not counting on this.
  5. Reduce scope:
    • This is our most viable option.

Questions we will ask for each project:

  1. Is there an active OSGeo-Live liaison person for the project?
  2. Has the Project Overview and Qucikstart been reviewed and are they current and complete?
  3. Do OpenHub metrics reflect an active and healthy community: https://live.osgeo.org/en/metrics.html
  4. Is the project being updated on OSGeo-Live with each release?

Key Milestones

5-Jun-2017 OSGeo-Live Feature Freeze (final application versions installed)
19-Jun-2017 OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final application versions installed - Beta stage)
24-Jul-2017 OSGeo-Live Final ISO
14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017 Boston

... full schedule

About OSGeo-Live

OSGeo-live is a Lubuntu based distribution of Geospatial Open Source Software, available via a Live DVD, Virtual Machine and USB. You can use OSGeo-Live to try a wide variety of open source geospatial software without installing anything.