Difference between revisions of "WebComTODO"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 26: Line 26:
 
==Submitted==
 
==Submitted==
  
* Any exisiting or future OSGeo 'Member registration' webpage needs to include a "Member Responsibilities" section along with a mechanism(e.g. checkbox) to indicate explicit acceptance of those responsibilities. Existing "Members" should have to edit their membership to also indicate acceptance. This is so that if the " Membership Change and Revocation" issue as mentioned in the [[Proposed_Membership_Rules]] ever arises the Board knows that the Member did agree to 'the rules'.
+
* Any exisiting or future OSGeo [[Membership Application]] webpage needs to include a "Member Responsibilities" section along with a mechanism(e.g. checkbox) to indicate explicit acceptance of those responsibilities. Existing "Members" should have to edit their membership to also indicate acceptance. This is so that if the " Membership Change and Revocation" issue as mentioned in the [[Proposed_Membership_Rules]] ever arises the Board knows that the Member did agree to 'the rules'.
  
 
==Approved and Pending==
 
==Approved and Pending==
  
 
==Completed for Review==
 
==Completed for Review==

Revision as of 18:46, 7 January 2007

General Direction

Transition Related

  • Approve and post a Privacy Policy. We used to have one similar to http://www.jxta.org/nonav/servlets/LegalNotices?type=PrivacyPolicy on the old site, and might want to emulate it.
  • Provide some mechanism for feedback for the website. Perhaps a "feedback" link that suggests email to info@osgeo.org?
  • Do we need a "terms of use" document? I'm not sure what happened to our old terms of use, but they were partly collabnet oriented.

Current Work

Pending

  • Work on web site overall style. (waiting for decision on tech infrastructure)
  • Organize translation volunteers. (need technical infrastructure for multilang support)

User-submitted tasks

Submitted

  • Any exisiting or future OSGeo Membership Application webpage needs to include a "Member Responsibilities" section along with a mechanism(e.g. checkbox) to indicate explicit acceptance of those responsibilities. Existing "Members" should have to edit their membership to also indicate acceptance. This is so that if the " Membership Change and Revocation" issue as mentioned in the Proposed_Membership_Rules ever arises the Board knows that the Member did agree to 'the rules'.

Approved and Pending

Completed for Review