Difference between revisions of "MapServer incubation status"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wiki-Sdlime (talk | contribs) |
(Updated to match template better.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | == | + | == Basics == |
− | ; | + | |
+ | ; Has the project been approved for incubation by the OSGeo board? | ||
: Yes, selected for "founding project" incubation by the OSGeo board. | : Yes, selected for "founding project" incubation by the OSGeo board. | ||
− | ; | + | ; Has an Incubation committee member been assigned as Mentor? |
− | : | + | : No, not yet. |
+ | |||
+ | == Infrastructure Transition == | ||
+ | |||
+ | ; Has the projectname.osgeo.org domain been populated with the projects web presence? | ||
+ | : No. This may be a major issue since we have invested a tremendous amount of time developing a Plone-based site. The is no desire to move away from that platform. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ; Is the OSGeo bug tracker being used for the project? | ||
+ | : No. A bugzilla repository is still hosted at the University of Minnesota. | ||
− | ; | + | ; Bug tracking repository moved? |
+ | : No. A bugzilla repository is still hosted at the University of Minnesota. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ; Is the OSGeo mailing list manager being used for the project? | ||
+ | : No. mailing lists are hosted at http://lists.umn.edu/ and we would like to move to OSGeo hosted lists at some point soon. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ; Is the OSGeo SVN or CVS system being used for the project? | ||
: No. Code is hosted in CVS at cvs.gis.umn.edu and is ok for now. Would like to move at some point. | : No. Code is hosted in CVS at cvs.gis.umn.edu and is ok for now. Would like to move at some point. | ||
− | ; | + | ; Are binary and source downloads available from the OSGeo download area? |
+ | : No, currently still just at the UMN download site. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Community Functioning == | ||
+ | |||
+ | ; Is there a functioning user support mechanisms (ie. mailing list)? | ||
+ | : The mapserver-users mailing list is quite active and well posed questions often result in more than one helpful response. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ; Are source and binary downloads for the package available? | ||
: Yes, visit http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/ | : Yes, visit http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/ | ||
− | ; | + | ; Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project? |
− | : | + | : Partially. MapServer has a technical steering committee that will likely fill this role. RFC-1 will have to be ammended to establish the TSC as the PSC. |
− | ; | + | ; Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc. |
− | : Yes, | + | : Yes, see RFC's (for TSC, and committer rules at least). May need to review committer rules in light of tighter OSGeo policy. |
− | ; | + | ; How many active developers are there? Are they from multiple organizations? |
− | : Yes, | + | : Yes, approximately 15 committers are established from 10 or more organizations. |
− | + | == Foundation Membership == | |
− | |||
− | ; | + | ; Have project documents been updated to reflect membership in the foundation, and the relationship of the project to the foundation? |
− | + | : If not, indicate when this will occur. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | : | ||
− | + | ; Has an effort been made to brand the project web site with OSGeo foundation web styling and branding marks? | |
+ | : If not, indicate what is planned. (''note: currently an OSGeo web style has not bee established'') | ||
− | Code | + | == Code Copyright Review == |
− | + | ; Has a [[Code Provenance Review]] document been prepared for the project? | |
+ | : Code provenance review not yet begun alothough a list of siginificant contributors is being established. That roster is available on the main MapServer website. | ||
− | + | ; Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed? | |
+ | : indicate outstanding issues. |
Revision as of 10:09, 10 April 2006
Basics
- Has the project been approved for incubation by the OSGeo board?
- Yes, selected for "founding project" incubation by the OSGeo board.
- Has an Incubation committee member been assigned as Mentor?
- No, not yet.
Infrastructure Transition
- Has the projectname.osgeo.org domain been populated with the projects web presence?
- No. This may be a major issue since we have invested a tremendous amount of time developing a Plone-based site. The is no desire to move away from that platform.
- Is the OSGeo bug tracker being used for the project?
- No. A bugzilla repository is still hosted at the University of Minnesota.
- Bug tracking repository moved?
- No. A bugzilla repository is still hosted at the University of Minnesota.
- Is the OSGeo mailing list manager being used for the project?
- No. mailing lists are hosted at http://lists.umn.edu/ and we would like to move to OSGeo hosted lists at some point soon.
- Is the OSGeo SVN or CVS system being used for the project?
- No. Code is hosted in CVS at cvs.gis.umn.edu and is ok for now. Would like to move at some point.
- Are binary and source downloads available from the OSGeo download area?
- No, currently still just at the UMN download site.
Community Functioning
- Is there a functioning user support mechanisms (ie. mailing list)?
- The mapserver-users mailing list is quite active and well posed questions often result in more than one helpful response.
- Are source and binary downloads for the package available?
- Yes, visit http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/
- Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project?
- Partially. MapServer has a technical steering committee that will likely fill this role. RFC-1 will have to be ammended to establish the TSC as the PSC.
- Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc.
- Yes, see RFC's (for TSC, and committer rules at least). May need to review committer rules in light of tighter OSGeo policy.
- How many active developers are there? Are they from multiple organizations?
- Yes, approximately 15 committers are established from 10 or more organizations.
Foundation Membership
- Have project documents been updated to reflect membership in the foundation, and the relationship of the project to the foundation?
- If not, indicate when this will occur.
- Has an effort been made to brand the project web site with OSGeo foundation web styling and branding marks?
- If not, indicate what is planned. (note: currently an OSGeo web style has not bee established)
Code Copyright Review
- Has a Code Provenance Review document been prepared for the project?
- Code provenance review not yet begun alothough a list of siginificant contributors is being established. That roster is available on the main MapServer website.
- Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed?
- indicate outstanding issues.