Difference between revisions of "Google Summer of Code Application 2011"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(project in title) |
(add some thoughts) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | == Old == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Base on [[Google Summer of Code Application 2009|2009]] and [[Google Summer of Code Application 2010]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Pending == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Verify if the application rules have changed in any way since we last looked at them. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == New == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Anne! | ||
+ | |||
+ | === For discussion === | ||
+ | ==== Possible additions to last year's ==== | ||
+ | |||
* Title: (''please include the name of the member project as part of the title, for example: "<u>Gee Whiz Foobar 2001 for QGIS</u>"'') | * Title: (''please include the name of the member project as part of the title, for example: "<u>Gee Whiz Foobar 2001 for QGIS</u>"'') | ||
Line 6: | Line 21: | ||
: (logic: If they will use the software for their degree they will care more about functional and absolutely correct outcomes. Also if they have a local univ. supervisor it's like a built-in co-mentor) | : (logic: If they will use the software for their degree they will care more about functional and absolutely correct outcomes. Also if they have a local univ. supervisor it's like a built-in co-mentor) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Possible removals vs. last year's ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | too many "why are you interested in this?" questions? combine some? (or not) | ||
[[Category: Google Summer of Code]] | [[Category: Google Summer of Code]] |
Revision as of 23:13, 2 February 2011
Old
- Base on 2009 and Google Summer of Code Application 2010
Pending
- Verify if the application rules have changed in any way since we last looked at them.
New
- Anne!
For discussion
Possible additions to last year's
- Title: (please include the name of the member project as part of the title, for example: "Gee Whiz Foobar 2001 for QGIS")
proposed additional question for the application:
- Would your application contribute to your ongoing studies/degree? If so, how?
- (logic: If they will use the software for their degree they will care more about functional and absolutely correct outcomes. Also if they have a local univ. supervisor it's like a built-in co-mentor)
Possible removals vs. last year's
too many "why are you interested in this?" questions? combine some? (or not)