Difference between revisions of "Board Meeting 2006 06 23"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* Review and approve [[Local Chapter Guidelines]] (still being drafted).
 
* Review and approve [[Local Chapter Guidelines]] (still being drafted).
 
* Approve Michael Gerlek as chair of VisCom.  
 
* Approve Michael Gerlek as chair of VisCom.  
 +
* Enumerate accomplishments so far, for publication on the web site
 
* Discuss possible merger of Webcom and SAC or possible assignment of Jason Birch as chair of WebCom.
 
* Discuss possible merger of Webcom and SAC or possible assignment of Jason Birch as chair of WebCom.
 
* Discuss how we will execute the top five priorities of OSGeo
 
* Discuss how we will execute the top five priorities of OSGeo
 
* Confirm dates/process for Board re-election (March 2007 rather than Sept 2006? This needs to go to wider discussion?
 
* Confirm dates/process for Board re-election (March 2007 rather than Sept 2006? This needs to go to wider discussion?

Revision as of 13:10, 22 June 2006

The 12th board meeting has been scheduled for the 23rd of Jun at 15:00 UTC (fixedtime), by phone and IRC (#osgeo) at the same time.

From Skype call : +99038275318640

To use a regular phone:

 From the US: call # 1-419-753-7120 (free, long distance costs apply).
 From the UK: call # 0870-119-2350 (10p/minute).

Your Conference Room Number is: 5318640.

Agenda

  • Appoint meeting secretary
  • Review and approve prior meeting minutes
  • Review and approve Official IncCom Documents (status), already approved by the Incubation Committee.
  • Review and approve Local Chapter Guidelines (still being drafted).
  • Approve Michael Gerlek as chair of VisCom.
  • Enumerate accomplishments so far, for publication on the web site
  • Discuss possible merger of Webcom and SAC or possible assignment of Jason Birch as chair of WebCom.
  • Discuss how we will execute the top five priorities of OSGeo
  • Confirm dates/process for Board re-election (March 2007 rather than Sept 2006? This needs to go to wider discussion?