Difference between revisions of "Incubation Phases"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is a working proposal coming out of conversations on the incubation@osgeo.org email list.
+
This is a working proposal coming out of conversations on the incubation@osgeo.org email list.  
  
== Motivation ==
+
Motivation:
 +
 
 +
* We have a number of projects with great proposals waiting for a mentor
  
 
* Recommendations coming out of GeoMoose incubation experience
 
* Recommendations coming out of GeoMoose incubation experience
* desire to pick up projects into the OSGeo Foundation faster then incubation committee volunteer levels allow
 
* Desire to motivate projects to finish incubation
 
  
 +
* Accept projects into the OSGeo Foundation faster then incubation committee volunteer levels allow
 +
 +
* Motivate projects to finish incubation
 +
 +
* What is [[OSGeo Labs]]?
 +
 +
Communication:
 +
 +
* Reach out to other committees and ask for help
 +
 +
* SAC: good relationship, initial questionnaire covers SAC requirements
 +
 +
* Marketting: good relationship, initial question covers some requirements, checklist covers remaining requirements
  
 
== Proposal: ==
 
== Proposal: ==
  
=== Incubation: Approved ==
+
Break the incubation process into phases allow projects that to start these activities (prior to a mentor being found).
 +
No additional work is added to the incubation process.
 +
 
 +
=== Incubation: Approved ===
  
 
* List the projects with a proposal that has been approved … and are just waiting for a mentor
 
* List the projects with a proposal that has been approved … and are just waiting for a mentor
  
* I view this as an essential outreach effort in fostering new projects, and do not like the incubation committee acting as a bottleneck
+
* outreach effort in fostering new projects, and do not like the incubation committee acting as a bottleneck
 +
 
 +
Communication:
 +
 
 +
* Incubation Committee: incubation email list, IRC meeting
  
REWARD:
+
Recognition:
  
* Recognition the project is associated with OSGeo Foundation
+
* project is associated with OSGeo Foundation
  
* Text link from OSgeo Website along the lines of "Volunteer for the incubation committee. These projects are waiting to enter OSGeo ..."
+
* Text link from OSgeo Website along the lines of "OSGeo would like to welcome  ..."
  
 
=== Incubation: Incubation ===
 
=== Incubation: Incubation ===
Line 29: Line 49:
  
 
*  OSGeo Incubation logo on their homepage, linking to http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/index.html to explain what incubation means
 
*  OSGeo Incubation logo on their homepage, linking to http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/index.html to explain what incubation means
REWARD: text *link* from the website to the marketing committee project details page (or OSGeo live page which is often better)
+
 
 +
Communication:
 +
 
 +
* Incubation Committee: incubation email list, IRC meeting
 +
 
 +
* Marketting Committee: email list, IRC meeting
 +
 
 +
* SAC: email, trac
 +
 
 +
Recognition:
 +
 
 +
* Text **link** from OSGeo website to the marketing committee project details page (or OSGeo live page which is often better)
 +
 
 +
* Access to SAC resources
  
 
=== Incubation: Complete ===
 
=== Incubation: Complete ===
  
 
- Projects that have finished their Provence Review, and have adopted an open development model for public participation
 
- Projects that have finished their Provence Review, and have adopted an open development model for public participation
 +
 
- Can still be working through the rest of the checklist as they make contact with the different OSGeo committees  
 
- Can still be working through the rest of the checklist as they make contact with the different OSGeo committees  
 +
 
- Project has a mentor going through the checklist with the goal of recommending the project for "graduation"
 
- Project has a mentor going through the checklist with the goal of recommending the project for "graduation"
 +
 
- Frankly this is the first point where OSGeo as a Foundation can actually recommend a project meets our expectations
 
- Frankly this is the first point where OSGeo as a Foundation can actually recommend a project meets our expectations
 +
 
- OSGeo Project logo on their homepage (with the subtext "incubation")
 
- OSGeo Project logo on their homepage (with the subtext "incubation")
  
REWARD:
+
Communication:
  
* Recognition Incubation requirements are completed
+
* Incubation Committee: incubation email list, IRC meeting
 +
 
 +
* Marketting Committee: email list, IRC meeting
 +
 
 +
* SAC: email, trac
 +
 
 +
Recognition:
 +
 
 +
* recognition Incubation requirements are completed
  
 
* project logo on the website under an incubation category, perhaps grated out?
 
* project logo on the website under an incubation category, perhaps grated out?
  
=== OSGeo: Project ==-
+
=== OSGeo: Project ===
  
 
*  completed the incubation checklist, recommended to the board for graduation, etc...
 
*  completed the incubation checklist, recommended to the board for graduation, etc...
Line 51: Line 96:
 
*  approved by the board, project officer, etc..
 
*  approved by the board, project officer, etc..
  
REWARD:
+
Recognition:
 +
 
 +
* Full recognition as an OSGeo Project
 +
 
 +
* Project officer for direct communication with the OSGeo Board (and other committees)
  
* Recognition as an OSGeo Project
 
 
* Colour logo on the webpage, sorted into the appropriate software category
 
* Colour logo on the webpage, sorted into the appropriate software category

Latest revision as of 20:16, 22 September 2012

This is a working proposal coming out of conversations on the incubation@osgeo.org email list.

Motivation:

  • We have a number of projects with great proposals waiting for a mentor
  • Recommendations coming out of GeoMoose incubation experience
  • Accept projects into the OSGeo Foundation faster then incubation committee volunteer levels allow
  • Motivate projects to finish incubation

Communication:

  • Reach out to other committees and ask for help
  • SAC: good relationship, initial questionnaire covers SAC requirements
  • Marketting: good relationship, initial question covers some requirements, checklist covers remaining requirements

Proposal:

Break the incubation process into phases allow projects that to start these activities (prior to a mentor being found). No additional work is added to the incubation process.

Incubation: Approved

  • List the projects with a proposal that has been approved … and are just waiting for a mentor
  • outreach effort in fostering new projects, and do not like the incubation committee acting as a bottleneck

Communication:

  • Incubation Committee: incubation email list, IRC meeting

Recognition:

  • project is associated with OSGeo Foundation
  • Text link from OSgeo Website along the lines of "OSGeo would like to welcome ..."

Incubation: Incubation

  • Projects that have completed their Status information .. and may still be looking for a mentor
  • The status page gathers details for SAC, and a minimal amount of information for the Marketting committee

Communication:

  • Incubation Committee: incubation email list, IRC meeting
  • Marketting Committee: email list, IRC meeting
  • SAC: email, trac

Recognition:

  • Text **link** from OSGeo website to the marketing committee project details page (or OSGeo live page which is often better)
  • Access to SAC resources

Incubation: Complete

- Projects that have finished their Provence Review, and have adopted an open development model for public participation

- Can still be working through the rest of the checklist as they make contact with the different OSGeo committees

- Project has a mentor going through the checklist with the goal of recommending the project for "graduation"

- Frankly this is the first point where OSGeo as a Foundation can actually recommend a project meets our expectations

- OSGeo Project logo on their homepage (with the subtext "incubation")

Communication:

  • Incubation Committee: incubation email list, IRC meeting
  • Marketting Committee: email list, IRC meeting
  • SAC: email, trac

Recognition:

  • recognition Incubation requirements are completed
  • project logo on the website under an incubation category, perhaps grated out?

OSGeo: Project

  • completed the incubation checklist, recommended to the board for graduation, etc...
  • approved by the board, project officer, etc..

Recognition:

  • Full recognition as an OSGeo Project
  • Project officer for direct communication with the OSGeo Board (and other committees)
  • Colour logo on the webpage, sorted into the appropriate software category