Difference between revisions of "GeoMoose Incubation Status"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wiki-Blammo (talk | contribs) |
m (→Community Functioning: added links to lists) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
; Is there a functioning user support mechanisms (ie. mailing list)? | ; Is there a functioning user support mechanisms (ie. mailing list)? | ||
| − | : The OSGeo hosted mailman list is the primary mechanism. It is working well. For some rough numbers, from March-November there were 828 emails so about 20ish emails a week. Most get answered promptly ending in a successful resolution. There is | + | : The OSGeo hosted mailman list is the primary mechanism. It is working well. For some rough numbers, from March-November there were 828 emails so about 20ish emails a week. Most get answered promptly ending in a successful resolution. There is mailing list for the PSC discussion. |
| + | : - http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users | ||
| + | : - http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc | ||
; Are source and binary downloads for the package available? | ; Are source and binary downloads for the package available? | ||
| Line 74: | Line 76: | ||
; Has a [[Code Provenance Review]] document been prepared for the project? | ; Has a [[Code Provenance Review]] document been prepared for the project? | ||
| − | : | + | : Review completed on email, links provided here [[GeoMoose Provenance Review]] |
; Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed? | ; Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed? | ||
| − | : | + | : Awaiting review process. |
; Are [[Commiter Responsibilities Guidelines]] covering legal issues in place? | ; Are [[Commiter Responsibilities Guidelines]] covering legal issues in place? | ||
| − | : yes/no - | + | : yes/no - http://www.geomoose.org/wiki/index.php/2012_05_31_Meeting |
[[Category:Incubation]] | [[Category:Incubation]] | ||
Latest revision as of 05:49, 24 September 2012
Document Status
IncCom Document Number: X
Version: 1.3
Status: draft
See also similar documents: Incubation Application Ticket and similar on GM wiki
Purpose
The project representative and mentor will use this template to inform the IncCom of the project status on a periodic basis. The state of the project, as reported using this template, will be the initial indication that a project is reaching graduation.
Terms and Definitions
- IncCom
- definition
Template
General
- Has the project been approved for incubation by the OSGeo board?
- Yes, at 2011/12/08 Board Meeting
- Has an Incubation Mentor been assigned to the project?
- Jody is our mentor
Infrastructure Transition
Note, for each of the following it isn't necessary to move to foundation infrastructure, but if you aren't a reason should be provided.
- Has the projectname.osgeo.org domain been populated with the projects web presence?
- No. We will use that to redirect to geomoose.org our current home in the near term. However, we would like to revisit this option in the future.
- Is the OSGeo bug tracker being used for the project?
- http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/report/1
- Is the OSGeo mailing list manager (http://lists.osgeo.org/) being used for the project?
- http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
- Is the OSGeo SVN being used for the project?
- http://svn.osgeo.org/geomoose/
- Are binary and source downloads available from http://download.osgeo.org ?
- http://svn.osgeo.org/geomoose/ AND http://geomoose.org/info/download.html
Community Functioning
- Is there a functioning user support mechanisms (ie. mailing list)?
- The OSGeo hosted mailman list is the primary mechanism. It is working well. For some rough numbers, from March-November there were 828 emails so about 20ish emails a week. Most get answered promptly ending in a successful resolution. There is mailing list for the PSC discussion.
- - http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
- - http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
- Are source and binary downloads for the package available?
- Yes http://svn.osgeo.org/geomoose/
- Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project?
- Yes. Dan, Jim, Bob, Brian*, Eli, and Brent are the PSC and have control. *Brian is the chair. More information here: http://www.geomoose.org/rfc/rfc-1.html?highlight=psc
- Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc.
- Yes. http://www.geomoose.org/rfc/rfc-1.html?highlight=psc
- How many active developers are there? Are they from multiple organizations?
- 6. Various organizations (Houston Engineering, SharedGeo, GeoAnalytic, Freelance, Local Government Agencies, etc)
Foundation Membership
- Have project documents been updated to reflect membership in the foundation, and the relationship of the project to the foundation?
- Upon graduation from incubation GeoMoose will proudly display its affiliation with OSGeo reflected throughout the project (website, mailing list, logos, etc)
- Has an effort been made to brand the project web site with OSGeo foundation web styling and branding marks?
- Upon graduation the GeoMoose website will link to the OSGeo website from several places, display the OSGeo logo, and state that GeoMoose is a project of the Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGeo). We will also submit a SAC ticket for OSGeo website updates (listing in projects). Down the road the PSC will probably discuss options to allow GeoMoose sponsorship through OSGeo project sponsorship
Code Copyright Review
- Has a Code Provenance Review document been prepared for the project?
- Review completed on email, links provided here GeoMoose Provenance Review
- Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed?
- Awaiting review process.
- Are Commiter Responsibilities Guidelines covering legal issues in place?
- yes/no - http://www.geomoose.org/wiki/index.php/2012_05_31_Meeting