Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G Europe 2015 OSGeo Europe BOF Agenda"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
# Membership discussion: face2face continuation of the thread on the discuss list [https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/ OSGeo-Discuss] 2015 Charter Member elections ([https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-June/014412.html here]! and [https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-July/014421.html here] etc)
 
# Membership discussion: face2face continuation of the thread on the discuss list [https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/ OSGeo-Discuss] 2015 Charter Member elections ([https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-June/014412.html here]! and [https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-July/014421.html here] etc)
 
# Planning of activities and goals for the industry workgroup (in relation with OSGeo Europe?)
 
# Planning of activities and goals for the industry workgroup (in relation with OSGeo Europe?)
 +
 +
== Minutes of BOF meeting ==
 +
 +
* question from Dirk: do we need an OSGeo Europe entity?
 +
** another org helps to act as legal entity to deal with more local projects
 +
** lobby in Europe specifically
 +
* Helena: how does this relate to OSGeo?
 +
* Maxi: there are already other OSGeo local chapters as legal entities
 +
* Alessandro: not aware of this, in the Italian community. Do we need a legal entity, or just a more organized movement along existing chapters
 +
* Kari: Finnish chapter in formation.  Organizing workshops are costly to organize on own, so external funding could help.
 +
 +
* do we need a structure to decide about next OSGeo-Europe hosting decision
 +
** do we focus on European funding
 +
** other things to discuss first
 +
 +
* Arnulf: legal entities already exist.
 +
 +
* Jeff: focus on what we are good at (building open software).  Hesitate to force funding issues on a 100% volunteer organization (OSGeo Europe or OSGeo global).
 +
 +
* Robin: look at leveraging other orgs in our space.
  
 
== Description ==
 
== Description ==
Line 11: Line 31:
 
OSGeo Europe should give support to OSGeo in lobbying European Union Institutions (Commission, Parliament, etc) related to specific EU-Themes (INSPIRE, H2020, Procurement policy, ...)
 
OSGeo Europe should give support to OSGeo in lobbying European Union Institutions (Commission, Parliament, etc) related to specific EU-Themes (INSPIRE, H2020, Procurement policy, ...)
 
It can act as an entity to manage H2020 projects, etc...
 
It can act as an entity to manage H2020 projects, etc...
 +
(from the preconference meeting of Geo4All on Tuesday July 14, Como): Osgeo could play a role in encouraging and should be issued by OSGeo.
 +
Also here OSGeo-EU legal structure can play a role for Europe.
  
 
=== Planning of activities and goals of the [industry] workgroup ===
 
=== Planning of activities and goals of the [industry] workgroup ===

Latest revision as of 08:28, 16 July 2015

Agenda:

  1. A European legal entity representing OSGeo
    1. SWOT Analysis concerning the foundation of an European legal structure
    2. mission of a future OSGeo Europe
  2. Membership discussion: face2face continuation of the thread on the discuss list OSGeo-Discuss 2015 Charter Member elections (here! and here etc)
  3. Planning of activities and goals for the industry workgroup (in relation with OSGeo Europe?)

Minutes of BOF meeting

  • question from Dirk: do we need an OSGeo Europe entity?
    • another org helps to act as legal entity to deal with more local projects
    • lobby in Europe specifically
  • Helena: how does this relate to OSGeo?
  • Maxi: there are already other OSGeo local chapters as legal entities
  • Alessandro: not aware of this, in the Italian community. Do we need a legal entity, or just a more organized movement along existing chapters
  • Kari: Finnish chapter in formation. Organizing workshops are costly to organize on own, so external funding could help.
  • do we need a structure to decide about next OSGeo-Europe hosting decision
    • do we focus on European funding
    • other things to discuss first
  • Arnulf: legal entities already exist.
  • Jeff: focus on what we are good at (building open software). Hesitate to force funding issues on a 100% volunteer organization (OSGeo Europe or OSGeo global).
  • Robin: look at leveraging other orgs in our space.

Description

OSGeo legal structure

I think it is important to create a European legal structure representing OSGeo in Europe, to be able to speak as one voice, and as a legal entity representing OSGeo values to the EU Administration, industry and R&D institutions. OSGeo Europe should give support to OSGeo in lobbying European Union Institutions (Commission, Parliament, etc) related to specific EU-Themes (INSPIRE, H2020, Procurement policy, ...) It can act as an entity to manage H2020 projects, etc... (from the preconference meeting of Geo4All on Tuesday July 14, Como): Osgeo could play a role in encouraging and should be issued by OSGeo. Also here OSGeo-EU legal structure can play a role for Europe.

Planning of activities and goals of the [industry] workgroup

I believe in eco-systems. A system where all the entities are acting in an equal important role in a whole system. Wednesday July 15, I have a presentation: " HOW OPEN SOURCE AND INSPIRE CAN BE USED AS A TACTICAL WEAPON FOR ECONOMICAL GROWTH IN EUROPE" where I want to start a discussion about using open source and open source licenses to support an ecosystem and get more impact as a network of SME's. I think openness to other parts of the eco-system is very important. Bring the different stakeholders together.

The membership discussion.

It is a yearly returning topic about the elections of the charter members and the board. Should there be a membership fee, and/or should we have charter members, where it is not clear that we have a charter. During this topic we have the chance to discuss face2face about this theme.