Difference between revisions of "Board Meeting 2008 01 11"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Agenda) |
m (Thirty Second Board Meeting moved to Board Meeting 2008 01 11) |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | This board meeting has been scheduled for the 11th of January at 16:00 UTC ([http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=1&day=11&year=2008&hour=16&min=0&sec=0 fixedtime]), by phone and IRC ([irc://irc.freenode.net/#osgeo #osgeo]) at the same time. | + | This board meeting has been scheduled for the 11th of January 2008 at 16:00 UTC ([http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=1&day=11&year=2008&hour=16&min=0&sec=0 fixedtime]), by phone and IRC ([irc://irc.freenode.net/#osgeo #osgeo]) at the same time. |
Communication will use the new [[Conference Call]] facilities. | Communication will use the new [[Conference Call]] facilities. | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* Appoint meeting secretary | * Appoint meeting secretary | ||
* Review and approve [[Thirty First Board Meeting]] minutes. | * Review and approve [[Thirty First Board Meeting]] minutes. | ||
− | |||
* Review who needs to be an officer of the foundation ([http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/incorporation/bylaws.html bylaws - see ARTICLE V Officers]) | * Review who needs to be an officer of the foundation ([http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/incorporation/bylaws.html bylaws - see ARTICLE V Officers]) | ||
* FOSS4G 2008 contracting and budget status review. | * FOSS4G 2008 contracting and budget status review. | ||
− | * Approve hosting the Fusion project on OSGeo infrastructure (already approved by SAC). | + | ** Apologies from PR for non-attendance performance |
+ | ** Getting current budget from '08 this week | ||
+ | ** Getting info from Tyler on 5013c issue WRT contract | ||
+ | ** Getting sponsorship update from Gavin this week | ||
+ | * Approve hosting the [http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/171 Fusion project] on OSGeo infrastructure (already approved by SAC). | ||
* Consider streamlining non-OSGeo project hosting procedure. | * Consider streamlining non-OSGeo project hosting procedure. | ||
+ | * Discuss feasibility of the quite speculative [[Data Project Incubation]] idea (JoW) | ||
+ | * Review and hopefully approve GeoTools/OSGeo contributors agreement, see [http://docs.codehaus.org/download/attachments/9765352/010-GtCopyright-HJMversion_FINAL.odt draft] and [http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Geotools+Legal+Review info page] (cholmes) | ||
+ | * Review [[Conflict Of Interest Policy]] (Tyler) | ||
+ | * Review [[SPD Prioritization]] proposal for highlighting sponsors and contributors (deferred to next meeting pending discussion on discuss list). | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Minutes == | ||
+ | * See IRC log at: http://logs.qgis.org/osgeo/%23osgeo.2008-01-11.log (start near 07:00 and ended at 08:00) | ||
+ | # Meeting started [http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=12&day=7&year=2007&hour=16&min=0&sec=0 16:07 UTC], met on conference call and in IRC | ||
+ | ## Appoint meeting secretary: Frank chaired the meeting, Tyler scribed | ||
+ | ## Roll call: Attending: Frank, Tyler, Markus, Arnulf, Chris, Jeroen, Jo | ||
+ | ## Absent: Dave, Paul, Bob | ||
+ | # Review and approve [[Thirty First Board Meeting]] minutes. | ||
+ | ## Frank motioned to adopt, Arnulf seconds, all were in favour. | ||
+ | # Review who needs to be an officer of the foundation ([http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/incorporation/bylaws.html bylaws - see ARTICLE V Officers]) | ||
+ | ## Discussed who/what and what officers do | ||
+ | ## '''TODO: Frank to follow up with Foundations mailing to discuss officers''' | ||
+ | # FOSS4G 2008 contracting and budget status review | ||
+ | ## Apologies from PR for non-attendance performance | ||
+ | ## Getting current budget from '08 this week | ||
+ | ## Getting info from Tyler on 5013c issue WRT contract | ||
+ | ## Getting sponsorship update from Gavin this week | ||
+ | ## Finance committee to recommend budget when ready | ||
+ | # Approve hosting the [http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/171 Fusion project] on OSGeo infrastructure (already approved by SAC). | ||
+ | ## SAC has agreed to support it, now recommending it to the board for approval | ||
+ | ## Arnulf explained background of the current SAC process | ||
+ | ## '''MOTION: To approve the SAC proposal to host the Fusion project''' Frank moved, Arnulf seconded... all were in favour | ||
+ | # Consider streamlining non-OSGeo project hosting procedure. | ||
+ | ## There was some [http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2007-December/date.html discussion] about this on the board list (Subject ''Motion regarding Systems Support...'') | ||
+ | ## Various ideas discussed. Suggest to give SAC more freedom to approve if there isn't any question from them about potential 'political' issues. | ||
+ | ## Considering email voting system from board to give final word. | ||
+ | ## '''MOTION: SAC will continue to refer the approvals to the Board via email, and will be accepted if answered by an email response of at least 5 votes of +1 from board members''', Frank moved, Chris seconded, all were in favour | ||
+ | # Discuss feasibility of the quite speculative [[Data Project Incubation]] idea (JoW) | ||
+ | ## Jo has presented the idea in a [http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Data_Project_Incubation wiki page] about taking the software incubation process and applying it to starting and approving Data focused projects | ||
+ | ## Markus mentioned the [http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Edu_Data_Package_North_Carolina OSGeo North Carolina education data set] which could be a candidate to try the procedure of data incubation, and is already regularly maintained (i.e. not just a forming project) | ||
+ | ## GeoData committee could handle the process, instead of incubation committee. It was suggested that licensing perspective would need to be ironed out by geodata committee too. | ||
+ | ## Very positive generally supportive discussion | ||
+ | ## Data volumes and working closely with Telascience.org would be needed as geodata projects have potential much large files issues than the software projects. | ||
+ | ## Frank describing that many data projects wouldn't necessarily need full PSC-style management and Chris explained how there could be several levels of geodata projects.. similar to the simple SAC "hosting-only" projects vs incubating projects, etc. | ||
+ | ## '''TODO: Jo will follow up with Geodata list for further discussion''' | ||
+ | # Review and hopefully approve GeoTools/OSGeo contributors agreement, see [http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Geotools+Legal+Review info page] (cholmes) | ||
+ | ## Chris provided some background of this process. | ||
+ | ## Question about if governing jurisdiction (California) is important or not. | ||
+ | ## This is first time that Geotools PSC and OSGeo legal council have a final agreement together. Substantial legal time spent on this review. | ||
+ | ## '''MOTION: To adopt this contributors agreement as an official template for OSGeo projects to choose from.''', Chris moved, Arnulf seconded, all were in joyous favour at wrapping up this longstanding work. | ||
+ | ## Any projects may choose to use this contributor agreement, and OSGeo officers can sign it on OSGeo's behalf. | ||
+ | ## Official copy hosted at http://download.osgeo.org/osgeo/legal/ (GeoToolsAssignmentToOsgeo.*) | ||
+ | # Review [http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Conflict_Of_Interest_Policy Conflict of Interest Policy] (Tyler) | ||
+ | ## Agreed that it should apply more broadly than just staff, but also to Board, and that the final version will reflect this. | ||
+ | ## '''MOTION: To adopt this as OSGeo's Conflict of Interest Policy, with above change''', Frank moved, Chris seconded, all were in favour. | ||
+ | ## '''TODO: Tyler will make changes as discussed and recirculate''' | ||
+ | # Review [[SPD Prioritization]] proposal for highlighting sponsors and contributors (deferred to next meeting pending discussion on discuss list). | ||
+ | ## Frank deferred to next meeting | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Other Items === | ||
+ | # Legal Support | ||
+ | ## Jeroen wondering how previous email discussion ended. There was general consensus in the thread, wondering if a concluding email may help to close/clarify the discussion. | ||
+ | # [http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/185 deegree Incubation Application] | ||
+ | ## Frank mentioned that deegree has applied. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Next Meeting date === | ||
+ | * Friday, February 1st ( 3 weeks ) | ||
+ | * Chris moved to close meeting, Arnulf second, all in favour | ||
[[Category: Board]] | [[Category: Board]] |
Latest revision as of 05:20, 23 July 2008
This board meeting has been scheduled for the 11th of January 2008 at 16:00 UTC (fixedtime), by phone and IRC (#osgeo) at the same time.
Communication will use the new Conference Call facilities.
Agenda
- Appoint meeting secretary
- Review and approve Thirty First Board Meeting minutes.
- Review who needs to be an officer of the foundation (bylaws - see ARTICLE V Officers)
- FOSS4G 2008 contracting and budget status review.
- Apologies from PR for non-attendance performance
- Getting current budget from '08 this week
- Getting info from Tyler on 5013c issue WRT contract
- Getting sponsorship update from Gavin this week
- Approve hosting the Fusion project on OSGeo infrastructure (already approved by SAC).
- Consider streamlining non-OSGeo project hosting procedure.
- Discuss feasibility of the quite speculative Data Project Incubation idea (JoW)
- Review and hopefully approve GeoTools/OSGeo contributors agreement, see draft and info page (cholmes)
- Review Conflict Of Interest Policy (Tyler)
- Review SPD Prioritization proposal for highlighting sponsors and contributors (deferred to next meeting pending discussion on discuss list).
Minutes
- See IRC log at: http://logs.qgis.org/osgeo/%23osgeo.2008-01-11.log (start near 07:00 and ended at 08:00)
- Meeting started 16:07 UTC, met on conference call and in IRC
- Appoint meeting secretary: Frank chaired the meeting, Tyler scribed
- Roll call: Attending: Frank, Tyler, Markus, Arnulf, Chris, Jeroen, Jo
- Absent: Dave, Paul, Bob
- Review and approve Thirty First Board Meeting minutes.
- Frank motioned to adopt, Arnulf seconds, all were in favour.
- Review who needs to be an officer of the foundation (bylaws - see ARTICLE V Officers)
- Discussed who/what and what officers do
- TODO: Frank to follow up with Foundations mailing to discuss officers
- FOSS4G 2008 contracting and budget status review
- Apologies from PR for non-attendance performance
- Getting current budget from '08 this week
- Getting info from Tyler on 5013c issue WRT contract
- Getting sponsorship update from Gavin this week
- Finance committee to recommend budget when ready
- Approve hosting the Fusion project on OSGeo infrastructure (already approved by SAC).
- SAC has agreed to support it, now recommending it to the board for approval
- Arnulf explained background of the current SAC process
- MOTION: To approve the SAC proposal to host the Fusion project Frank moved, Arnulf seconded... all were in favour
- Consider streamlining non-OSGeo project hosting procedure.
- There was some discussion about this on the board list (Subject Motion regarding Systems Support...)
- Various ideas discussed. Suggest to give SAC more freedom to approve if there isn't any question from them about potential 'political' issues.
- Considering email voting system from board to give final word.
- MOTION: SAC will continue to refer the approvals to the Board via email, and will be accepted if answered by an email response of at least 5 votes of +1 from board members, Frank moved, Chris seconded, all were in favour
- Discuss feasibility of the quite speculative Data Project Incubation idea (JoW)
- Jo has presented the idea in a wiki page about taking the software incubation process and applying it to starting and approving Data focused projects
- Markus mentioned the OSGeo North Carolina education data set which could be a candidate to try the procedure of data incubation, and is already regularly maintained (i.e. not just a forming project)
- GeoData committee could handle the process, instead of incubation committee. It was suggested that licensing perspective would need to be ironed out by geodata committee too.
- Very positive generally supportive discussion
- Data volumes and working closely with Telascience.org would be needed as geodata projects have potential much large files issues than the software projects.
- Frank describing that many data projects wouldn't necessarily need full PSC-style management and Chris explained how there could be several levels of geodata projects.. similar to the simple SAC "hosting-only" projects vs incubating projects, etc.
- TODO: Jo will follow up with Geodata list for further discussion
- Review and hopefully approve GeoTools/OSGeo contributors agreement, see info page (cholmes)
- Chris provided some background of this process.
- Question about if governing jurisdiction (California) is important or not.
- This is first time that Geotools PSC and OSGeo legal council have a final agreement together. Substantial legal time spent on this review.
- MOTION: To adopt this contributors agreement as an official template for OSGeo projects to choose from., Chris moved, Arnulf seconded, all were in joyous favour at wrapping up this longstanding work.
- Any projects may choose to use this contributor agreement, and OSGeo officers can sign it on OSGeo's behalf.
- Official copy hosted at http://download.osgeo.org/osgeo/legal/ (GeoToolsAssignmentToOsgeo.*)
- Review Conflict of Interest Policy (Tyler)
- Agreed that it should apply more broadly than just staff, but also to Board, and that the final version will reflect this.
- MOTION: To adopt this as OSGeo's Conflict of Interest Policy, with above change, Frank moved, Chris seconded, all were in favour.
- TODO: Tyler will make changes as discussed and recirculate
- Review SPD Prioritization proposal for highlighting sponsors and contributors (deferred to next meeting pending discussion on discuss list).
- Frank deferred to next meeting
Other Items
- Legal Support
- Jeroen wondering how previous email discussion ended. There was general consensus in the thread, wondering if a concluding email may help to close/clarify the discussion.
- deegree Incubation Application
- Frank mentioned that deegree has applied.
Next Meeting date
- Friday, February 1st ( 3 weeks )
- Chris moved to close meeting, Arnulf second, all in favour