Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fundraising"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Jason
 
Jason
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
Jason, I wouldn't have an objection to other sponsorship levels, but we do need to balance the return against the admin overhead in administering.  Also, since we have sponsorship instead of membership I wonder if this will make it hard to sell to organizations such as municipal governments.  This is something I don't have a good sense of.  --[[User:Warmerda|Warmerda]] 15:53, 6 March 2006 (CET)

Revision as of 06:53, 6 March 2006

Will there be an option for additional sponsorship levels?

As a municipality, we have membership in the OGC http://www.opengeospatial.org/about/?page=levels for $500/year. I could justify this expense to our taxpayers, where I'm not sure that initially I will be able to justify a higher level of membership.

The OGC model is a bit too fine-grained, and is more "membership" oriented, but overall I think it does a pretty good job of identifying the pain points for various organisations.

Jason


Jason, I wouldn't have an objection to other sponsorship levels, but we do need to balance the return against the admin overhead in administering. Also, since we have sponsorship instead of membership I wonder if this will make it hard to sell to organizations such as municipal governments. This is something I don't have a good sense of. --Warmerda 15:53, 6 March 2006 (CET)