Difference between revisions of "Community Mapbuilder Incubation Progress"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (updating status) |
(completed license audit) |
||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
; Has a [[Code Provenance Review]] document been prepared for the project? | ; Has a [[Code Provenance Review]] document been prepared for the project? | ||
− | : | + | : Yes. Results are in the Mapbuilder repository at mapbuilder/docs/licenseAudit/* and copied to [[Community Mapbuilder Provenance Review]]. |
− | |||
; Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed? | ; Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed? | ||
: ''indicate outstanding issues.'' | : ''indicate outstanding issues.'' |
Revision as of 04:39, 17 June 2006
Basics
- Has the project been approved for incubation by the OSGeo board?
- Yes.
- Has an OSGeo committee member been assigned as Mentor?
- Daniel Brookshier has been designated incubation mentor for Community MapBuilder.
Infrastructure Transition
Note, for each of the following it isn't necessary to move to foundation infrastructure, but if you aren't a reason should be provided.
- Has the projectname.osgeo.org domain been populated with the projects web presence?
- If not why, and has the project page got a prominent link to the real home?
- http://communitymapbuilder.osgeo.org has been set up and points to http://communitymapbuilder.org.
- Comments from Cameron Shorter: Currently I'm reluctant to move our services to colabnet. Migrating to Colabnet would involve a medium amount of effort and would loose some information like bugs from the bug tracker.
- Should we leave OSGeo in the future, or OSGeo decides to stop using Collabnet, we would be faced with a similar exit cost because there is not a free version of Colabnet for Open Source projects.
- I would prefer to keep all project tools on one server rather than many. Currently codehaus.org is providing our tools.
- Why not just point the domain at the existing MapBuilder site? -- SchuylerErle
- Schuyler, I agree that this is a good idea, but we were told that this didn't fit with
- Is the OSGeo bug tracker being used for the project?
-
- No. See justification above.
- Is the OSGeo mailing list manager being used for the project?
- No. Lists are stored on Sourceforge which has a slightly better interface - (Web subscribe interface, threads in the archieve). We could move our lists in future if archieves can be moved as well. But as yet, I don't see a need to move to an inferior tool.
- Is the OSGeo SVN or CVS system being used for the project?
- No. See justification above.
- Are binary and source downloads available from the OSGeo download area?
- Not yet, we use Sourceforge, but we can do this if needed.
Community Functioning
- Is there a functioning user support mechanisms (ie. mailing list)?
- Yes, we have a busy list with lots of answers to user queries.
- http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=mapbuilder-devel
- http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=mapbuilder-users
- Are source and binary downloads for the package available?
- Yes. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=35246
- Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project?
- Yes. Project Steering Committee has been in effect since the start of the project. It currently consists of:
- Cameron Shorter
- Mike Adair
- Patrice Cappelaere
- Steven Ottens
- Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc.
- Documentation in this area is a bit weak. This is what I could find:
http://communitymapbuilder.org/display/MAP/Contributers+Guide
- Action on Mapbuilder: We need to be more specific about project decision making.
- How many active developers are there? Are they from multiple organizations?
- 4 Core developers (the PSC) and around 10 to 15 other developers.
- All the PSC work for different organisations and live in different countries. Similarly, the developers and users all come from different organisations and geographic locations.
Foundation Membership
- Have project documents been updated to reflect membership in the foundation, and the relationship of the project to the foundation?
- Not yet.
- Question for OSGeo: What are you looking for here?
- Has an effort been made to brand the project web site with OSGeo foundation web styling and branding marks?
- Not yet. We will wait for an OSGeo web style to be established before using this style.
Code Copyright Review
- Has a Code Provenance Review document been prepared for the project?
- Yes. Results are in the Mapbuilder repository at mapbuilder/docs/licenseAudit/* and copied to Community Mapbuilder Provenance Review.
- Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed?
- indicate outstanding issues.