Difference between revisions of "FDO Incubation Status"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
; Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed? | ; Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed? | ||
− | : Yes | + | :* Yes. A full source code review has been completed. |
+ | :** The origins of the FDO source code have been identified | ||
+ | :** All Third-Party code dependencies have been identified and documented | ||
+ | :** All Third-Party licence agreements have been identified and documented | ||
+ | :** All source files have been checked for the appearance of the GNU GPL copyright text | ||
+ | :** All source files have been copyright reviewed and the copyright(s) holders specified | ||
+ | :** All data files have been copyright reviewed and the copyright(s) holders specified | ||
+ | :*** During the review process, this issue presented itself as a key issue of concern by the PSC. Data files whose provenance could not be adequately traced were subsequently removed from the FDO SVN. | ||
+ | :*** Refer to: | ||
+ | :**** http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/ticket/230 | ||
+ | :**** http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/ticket/179 | ||
+ | :**** http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/ticket/145 | ||
; Are [[Commiter Responsibilities Guidelines]] covering legal issues in place? | ; Are [[Commiter Responsibilities Guidelines]] covering legal issues in place? |
Revision as of 12:34, 28 January 2008
General
- Has the project been approved for incubation by the OSGeo board?
- Yes, FDO is a board approved project.
- Has an Incubation Mentor been assigned to the project?
- Yes, Daniel Morissette is assigned as mentor.
Infrastructure Transition
Note, for each of the following it isn't necessary to move to foundation infrastructure, but if you aren't a reason should be provided.
- Has the projectname.osgeo.org domain been populated with the projects web presence?
- Yes. http://fdo.osgeo.org/ has been established and populated with project content
- Is the OSGeo bug tracker being used for the project?
- Yes. Refer to http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo
- Is the OSGeo mailing list manager (http://lists.osgeo.org/) being used for the project?
- Yes. All FDO mailing lists are now listed at http://lists.osgeo.org. They include 'fdo-announce', 'fdo-internals', 'fdo-users', 'fdo-trac' and 'fdo-commits'
- Is the OSGeo SVN being used for the project?
- Yes. Refer to http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/browser
- Are binary and source downloads available from http://download.osgeo.org ?
- Yes. Refer to http://download.osgeo.org/fdo
Community Functioning
- Is there a functioning user support mechanisms (ie. mailing list)?
- Yes. There is a well established developer community and user community.
- The mailing lists are in place and are functioning well. Issues raised on the internals and users mailing lists are being addressed in a timely manner. The available FDO mailing lists can be found at http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo. They include 'fdo-announce', 'fdo-internals', 'fdo-users', 'fdo-trac' and 'fdo-commits'.
- User support is also available using trac at http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo and though irc at irc://irc.freenode.net/#fdo
- Project stats is available on ohloh.net: http://www.ohloh.net/projects/4662
- Are source and binary downloads for the package available?
- Binary, Source code and Documentation downloads are available for multiple FDO releases. Refer to http://fdo.osgeo.org/content/downloads. Currently binary support is limited to release builds on Windows XP and Redhat EL 4.
- Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project?
- Yes. Refer to http://fdo.osgeo.org/psc.html. The committee was formed in October 2006. The PSC members include Greg Boone (chair), Frank Warmerdam, Robert Bray, Jason Birch, Orest Halustchak, Haris Kurtagic and Mateusz Loskot.
- Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc.
- Yes. Refer to http://fdo.osgeo.org/psc.html
- How many active developers are there? Are they from multiple organizations?
- 12 developers from Autodesk and at least 3 external developers.
Foundation Membership
- Have project documents been updated to reflect membership in the foundation, and the relationship of the project to the foundation?
- Yes
- Has an effort been made to brand the project web site with OSGeo foundation web styling and branding marks?
- Yes - The FDO site (http://fdo.osgeo.org) content inherits and uses the styles defined by the osgeo site.
Code Copyright Review
- Has a Code Provenance Review document been prepared for the project?
- Yes it can be found at: http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/FDO_Provenance_Review
- Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed?
-
- Yes. A full source code review has been completed.
- The origins of the FDO source code have been identified
- All Third-Party code dependencies have been identified and documented
- All Third-Party licence agreements have been identified and documented
- All source files have been checked for the appearance of the GNU GPL copyright text
- All source files have been copyright reviewed and the copyright(s) holders specified
- All data files have been copyright reviewed and the copyright(s) holders specified
- During the review process, this issue presented itself as a key issue of concern by the PSC. Data files whose provenance could not be adequately traced were subsequently removed from the FDO SVN.
- Refer to:
- Yes. A full source code review has been completed.
- Are Commiter Responsibilities Guidelines covering legal issues in place?
- Yes.
- Refer to http://fdo.osgeo.org/files/Individual%20Contributor%20Agreement%20-%20FDO.pdf
- Refer to http://fdo.osgeo.org/files/Corporate%20Contributor%20Agreement%20-%20FDO.pdf