Difference between revisions of "Benchmarking 2011/MeetingLog"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(add today's meeting notes) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*** data sources discussion | *** data sources discussion | ||
**** teams voted in support of using OpenStreetMap data for Colorado for vector | **** teams voted in support of using OpenStreetMap data for Colorado for vector | ||
| − | **** for raster, mpdaly suggests using DEMs | + | ***** for raster, mpdaly suggests using DEMs |
**** mdsmith suggests USGS Seamless NED or NAIP, and he also gets snowpack data daily | **** mdsmith suggests USGS Seamless NED or NAIP, and he also gets snowpack data daily | ||
*** testing process discussion | *** testing process discussion | ||
Revision as of 10:13, 9 February 2011
Benchmarking 2011 IRC Meetings
- Wed February 9th, 2011 (log: http://logs.qgis.org/foss4g/%23foss4g.2011-02-09.log)
- attendance:
- Marco Hugentobler - QGIS mapserver
- Jeff McKenna - MapServer
- Gabriel Roldan - GeoServer
- Alex Wong - ERDAS
- Mike Smith - Hardware / MapServer / Oracle MapViewer
- Martin Daly - Cadcorp
- Summary
- data sources discussion
- teams voted in support of using OpenStreetMap data for Colorado for vector
- for raster, mpdaly suggests using DEMs
- mdsmith suggests USGS Seamless NED or NAIP, and he also gets snowpack data daily
- teams voted in support of using OpenStreetMap data for Colorado for vector
- testing process discussion
- teams support the plan to test only best effort, with data in format of your choice, but data must retain original detail (no generalizing)
- continued discussion on testing tilecaching by servers...with the goal being to enhance how each server handles labelling on tiles
- data sources discussion
- attendance:
- Wed February 2nd, 2011 (log: http://logs.qgis.org/foss4g/%23foss4g.2011-02-02.log)
- attendance:
- Marco Hugentobler - QGIS mapserver
- Mike Smith - Hardware / MapServer / Oracle MapViewer
- Alex Wong - ERDAS
- Daniel Morissette - MapServer
- Martin Daly - Cadcorp
- Jeff McKenna - MapServer
- Summary
- data sources discussion
- unknown if suggested SPOT imagery can be distributed freely to the public
- we should probably use local Denver/Colorado data
- possibility of using U.S. Census TIGER data for Colorado
- the benchmarking exercise in 2009 used TIGER data for Texas
- mpdaly suggests using OpenStreetMap data
- sample styling of MapServer using OSM data for Colorado already exists: map on http://www.mapserver.org/trunk/
- testing process discussion
- marco suggested that we have separate tests for point/line/poly, in addition to other tests
- all teams voted to accept that we would only present a subset of the tests (we will decide what subset to use later)
- mdsmith suggests testing tilecache seeding for each server...testing how the server's labeling engine handles edges of tiles
- data sources discussion
- attendance:
- Wed January 12th, 2011 (log: http://logs.qgis.org/foss4g/%23foss4g.2011-01-12.log)
- attendance:
- Andrea Aaime - GeoServer
- Jeff McKenna - MapServer
- Pirmin Kalberer - QGIS mapserver
- Marco Hugentobler - QGIS mapserver
- Mike Smith - Hardware / MapServer / Oracle MapViewer
- Anne-Sophie Collignon - Erdas
- Daniel Morissette - MapServer
- Adrian Custer - Undetermined
- Andreas Schmitz - Deegree
- Martin Daly - Cadcorp
- Jean-Francois Faudi - Data
- Ivan Sanchez - Vocals
- Summary
- acuster: relayed that ESRI is still discussing internally about commitment
- mdsmith: servers are now in our new datacenter and in racks. they are on ups + standby generator
- discussion on data sources
- jeffaudi: can supply 100 tiles of 1GB GeoTIFF imagery (SPOT)
- all agreed data and styles need to be prepared soon
- suggestion that testing methodology needs to be redesigned
- teams will be allowed to join the exercise late, but must follow the rules of engagement (they can propose changes, but teams are not required to follow)
- attendance: