Difference between revisions of "FDO Incubation Status"

Revision as of 15:43, 13 March 2007

General

Has the project been approved for incubation by the OSGeo board?: Yes, FDO is a board approved project.

Has an Incubation Mentor been assigned to the project?: Yes, Daniel Morissette is assigned as mentor.

Infrastructure Transition

Note, for each of the following it isn't necessary to move to foundation infrastructure, but if you aren't a reason should be provided.

Has the projectname.osgeo.org domain been populated with the projects web presence?: Yes

Is the OSGeo bug tracker being used for the project?: Yes

Is the OSGeo mailing list manager (http://lists.osgeo.org/) being used for the project?: Yes

Is the OSGeo SVN being used for the project?: Yes

Are binary and source downloads available from http://download.osgeo.org ?: Yes

Community Functioning

Is there a functioning user support mechanisms (ie. mailing list)?: Yes. The mailing lists are functioning fairly very well. There is a well established developer community but the user community is progressing at a somewhat slower pace. The posts made to the users mailing lists are being answered.

Are source and binary downloads for the package available?: Source coe and documentation downloads are available. Binary downloads are not availabale.

Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project?: Yes.

Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc.: Yes. Refer to http://fdo.osgeo.org/psc.html

How many active developers are there? Are they from multiple organizations?: 12 developers from Autodesk and at least 3 external developers.

Foundation Membership

Have project documents been updated to reflect membership in the foundation, and the relationship of the project to the foundation?: Yes

Has an effort been made to brand the project web site with OSGeo foundation web styling and branding marks?: Yes - The FDO site content inherits and uses the styles defined by the osgeo site.

Code Copyright Review

Has a Code Provenance Review document been prepared for the project?: Yes it can be found at: http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/FDO_Provenance_Review

Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed?: TBD

Are Commiter Responsibilities Guidelines covering legal issues in place?: TBD

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 ; Has the projectname.osgeo.org domain been populated with the projects web presence?
-: If not why, and has the project page got a prominent link to the real home?
+: Yes
 ; Is the OSGeo bug tracker being used for the project?
-: If not, why?
+: Yes
 ; Is the OSGeo mailing list manager (http://lists.osgeo.org/) being used for the project?
-: If not, why?
+: Yes
 ; Is the OSGeo SVN being used for the project?
-: If not, why?
+: Yes
 ; Are binary and source downloads available from http://download.osgeo.org ?
-: If not, why?
+: Yes
 == Community Functioning ==
 ; Is there a functioning user support mechanisms (ie. mailing list)?
-: indicate the available user support mechanisms, and whether they seem to be functioning well (are getting used and get answers).
+: Yes. The mailing lists are functioning fairly very well. There is a well established developer community but the user community is progressing at a somewhat slower pace. The posts made to the users mailing lists are being answered.
 ; Are source and binary downloads for the package available?
-: yes/no (and any caveats)
+: Source coe and documentation downloads are available. Binary downloads are not availabale.
 ; Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project?
-: yes/no, indicate members and whether it has effective control.
+: Yes.
 ; Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc.
-: yes/no - provide pointers to various related documents.
+: Yes. Refer to http://fdo.osgeo.org/psc.html
 ; How many active developers are there?  Are they from multiple organizations?
-: Indicate number and some organizations involved.
+: 12 developers from Autodesk and at least 3 external developers.
 == Foundation Membership ==
 ; Have project documents been updated to reflect membership in the foundation, and the relationship of the project to the foundation?
-: If not, indicate when this will occur.
+: Yes
 ; Has an effort been made to brand the project web site with OSGeo foundation web styling and branding marks?
-: If not, indicate what is planned.  (''note: currently an OSGeo web style has not bee established'')
+: Yes - The FDO site content inherits and uses the styles defined by the osgeo site.
 == Code Copyright Review ==
 ; Has a [[Code Provenance Review]] document been prepared for the project?
-: yes/no - point to review document.
+: Yes it can be found at: http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/FDO_Provenance_Review
 ; Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed?
-: indicate outstanding issues.
+: TBD
 ; Are [[Commiter Responsibilities Guidelines]] covering legal issues in place?
-: yes/no - point to the guidelines and indicate if it is adopted by PSC, and accepted by all commiters.
+: TBD
 [[Category:Incubation]]

Difference between revisions of "FDO Incubation Status"

Revision as of 15:43, 13 March 2007

Contents

General

Infrastructure Transition

Community Functioning

Foundation Membership

Code Copyright Review

Navigation menu

Search